2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic active sites in NiFe oxyhydroxide upon Au nanoparticles decoration for highly efficient electrochemical water oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EIS and C dl fitted on these samples confirmed the fast charge-transfer rate and large active surface of CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF (0.15) (Figures S24 and S25). In further comparison with recently reported Ni-based electrocatalysts, , CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF performed among the best (Figure d), demonstrating the merit of this ceria-promotion strategy. Regarding the possible structural evolution of NF during OER, only the counterparts prepared on NF were taken into this comparison.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EIS and C dl fitted on these samples confirmed the fast charge-transfer rate and large active surface of CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF (0.15) (Figures S24 and S25). In further comparison with recently reported Ni-based electrocatalysts, , CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF performed among the best (Figure d), demonstrating the merit of this ceria-promotion strategy. Regarding the possible structural evolution of NF during OER, only the counterparts prepared on NF were taken into this comparison.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…(c) Summary of η 10 and current density at Ni 2+ /Ni 3+ oxidation peaks of these CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF. (d) Comparison of OER performance of optimized CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF with recently reported Ni-based OER electrocatalysts that were fabricated on NF (ref samples: 1: NM50-Ni 3 S 4 /NF, 2: Au@Ni­( Fe )­OOH-NF, 3: Ni 3 S 2 /MnO 2 -NF, 4: NiO/Co 3 O 4 -NF, 5: Ni 3 S 4 /NF, 6: Co-Ni 3 N/NF, 7: Ni 3 N-Co 3 N/C@NF, 8: Ni 3 S 2 @NGCLs/NF, 9: NiFe-LDH@MnCO 3 /NF, 10: LDH-MOF@NF, 11: Mo-NiCo 2 O 4 /NF, 12: NiCo 2 O 4 @CoS/NF, 13: (Ni 0.90 Cr 0.10 ) 2 P/NF, 14: Ni 3 S 2 @Ni/NF, 15: La­(CrMnFeCo 2 Ni)­O 3 /NF). (e) Repeated CVs and (inset of e) a chronoamperometry test (η = 300 mV) of CeO 2 -Ni 3 S 2 /NF in 1.0 M KOH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was also calculated to identify the quantity and intrinsic activity of active sites as well as electrical conductivity. 53 As shown in Fig. 4c, Mo/Mo 2 C@CoO@NC achieves the highest C dl value (5.9 mF cm −1 ) and ECSA (147.5), higher than those of RuO 2 (5.6 mF cm −2 , 140), ZIF-67-HT (2.8 mF cm −2 , 70), and MoO 3 -HT (0.25 mF cm −2 , 6.25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…, where M 2+ is a divalent metal ion, M 3+ is a trivalent metal ion, and A n− is the interlayered anion. [18][19][20][21][22][23] In its early years, the research on transition metals for OER catalysts in alkaline environment mainly focused on nickel and nickel-based oxides. In 1987, Corrigan et al found that adding an ultra-low concentration of Fe obviously ameliorated the OER performance of nickel oxide: the combination of Ni and Fe as impurities in Ni(OH) 2 reduces the overpotential of OER in alkaline solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%