2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48229-6_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Adaptation of Cooperative Agents for MRI Brain Scans Segmentation

Abstract: Abstract.To cope with the difficulty of MRI brain scans automatic segmentation, we need to constrain and control the selection and the adjustment of processing tools depending on the local image characteristics. To extract domain and control knowledge from the image, we propose to use situated cooperative agents whose dedicated behavior, i.e. segmentation of one type of tissue, is dynamically adapted with respect to their position in the image. Qualitative maps are used as a common framework to represent knowl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It works locally, diffuses its partial results to its acquaintances (for instance agents dedicated to the same tissue in neighbouring regions), shares results via specific maps and coordinates its actions with other agents to reach a global common goal. On various realistic brain phantoms, we obtained results (about 84% of truth positive) comparable to other optimal methods, which rely on MRF models and include a bias field correction map, with a lower computational burden (less than 5 min to segment a complete volume) (see [4]). The present evaluation was performed on real MRI scans at 1.5 T.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It works locally, diffuses its partial results to its acquaintances (for instance agents dedicated to the same tissue in neighbouring regions), shares results via specific maps and coordinates its actions with other agents to reach a global common goal. On various realistic brain phantoms, we obtained results (about 84% of truth positive) comparable to other optimal methods, which rely on MRF models and include a bias field correction map, with a lower computational burden (less than 5 min to segment a complete volume) (see [4]). The present evaluation was performed on real MRI scans at 1.5 T.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…To conclude, based on our experimentations with phantoms [4] and realistic MRI brain scans, situated and cooperative agents appear as an interesting framework to combine several information processing steps that are required for image interpretation.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, given the good agreement between the models obtained independently by different operators, the influence on the results should be small. We are currently working to improve our segmentation procedure (Richard et al, 2002), and hope to further increase the reproducibility of the obtained surface models in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting line of work involving distributed and cooperative approaches to image segmentation and interpretation was presented over the years by the research group of C. Garbay [99,[137][138][139][140][141]. Their multi-agent approach was later also integrated with classical methods for image segmentation which are based on Markov random fields [142].…”
Section: Image and Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 98%