2019
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2019.1612925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis and performance of a repoint track switch

Abstract: Repoint is an alternative concept for the design of track switches developed at Loughborough University. The concept, based around a stub switch, offers several improvements over current designs. Through a novel locking arrangement, it allows parallel, multi-channel actuation and passive locking functions, providing a high degree of fault tolerance. The aim of the work presented in this paper is to evaluate the dynamic interaction forces due to the passage of rolling stock over the switch and, particularly, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in [19] a very simple mathematical model was used to estimate the maximum torque to operate the stub switch. Bezin et al [20] used multi-body simulations to evaluate the dynamic interaction forces due to the passage of rolling stock over the stub switch rail ends, in comparison to a conventional switch. Kaijuka et al [21] included quite a detailed process to define the switch (stub switch) system parameters, experimental validation of the model and tested different close loop feedback control approaches, which were demonstrated on a small scale lab-demonstrator of a single bearer with no switch rails/load).…”
Section: Introduction 1literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [19] a very simple mathematical model was used to estimate the maximum torque to operate the stub switch. Bezin et al [20] used multi-body simulations to evaluate the dynamic interaction forces due to the passage of rolling stock over the stub switch rail ends, in comparison to a conventional switch. Kaijuka et al [21] included quite a detailed process to define the switch (stub switch) system parameters, experimental validation of the model and tested different close loop feedback control approaches, which were demonstrated on a small scale lab-demonstrator of a single bearer with no switch rails/load).…”
Section: Introduction 1literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these elements represent a small part of the overall railway line, turnouts are associated with a large share of the total maintenance expenses of the railway infrastructure. e existence of variable rail geometry and track flexibility makes the turnout negotiation highly prone to impact loads and to the appearance of unusual wheel-rail contact configurations when compared with regular operations with constant rail profiles [27][28][29]. e most critical cases occur in the switch, when the wheel transfers from the stock rail to the switch rail, and in the crossing, when the wheel passes from the wing rail to the crossing nose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%