2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of a piezoelectric system to compensate for workpiece deformations in flexible milling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the semifinishing and finishing milling processes, chatter often occurs due to the low rigidity of these structures, resulting in poor dimensional accuracy and surface finish. To avoid this kind of milling chatter, different strategies 2,3 such as mounting active/passive dampers on the spindle or workpiece 4–10 and optimizing process parameters based on chatter prediction or identification 1,11–15 have been proposed. Among these strategies, selection of chatter‐free process parameters based on predicted stability lobe diagrams (SLDs) is the most widely used method 16–22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the semifinishing and finishing milling processes, chatter often occurs due to the low rigidity of these structures, resulting in poor dimensional accuracy and surface finish. To avoid this kind of milling chatter, different strategies 2,3 such as mounting active/passive dampers on the spindle or workpiece 4–10 and optimizing process parameters based on chatter prediction or identification 1,11–15 have been proposed. Among these strategies, selection of chatter‐free process parameters based on predicted stability lobe diagrams (SLDs) is the most widely used method 16–22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strategies 2,3 such as mounting active/passive dampers on the spindle or workpiece [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and optimizing process parameters based on chatter prediction or identification 1,[11][12][13][14][15] have been proposed. Among these strategies, selection of chatter-free process parameters based on predicted stability lobe diagrams (SLDs) is the most widely used method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control system is based on a reference model that runs in real time which is a good procedure to compensate for dimensional errors due to part deformation in milling machining. A similar unidirectional controlled structure was presented in [26] based on a piezo stack actuator and a property support base de-signed with proper flexure hinges to allow the compensation of the workpiece machining disturbances. Despite the good results, the control system was based on an analytical model to estimate the force and consequently the workpiece is dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a method was proposed to measure the equivalent residual stresses generated by milling, and on this basis the calculation of the deformation of the part was introduced [4]. Similarly, a system was presented to compensate for workpiece deformations in flexible peripheral milling based on piezoelectric actuators and their dynamic model [5], and a dynamic deformation model of the workpiece was constructed using the new method and the experiments are validated [6]. Showing these studies the importance of deformations in the milling process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%