2024
DOI: 10.12700/aph.21.1.2024.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Analysis of Geosynthetic-reinforced Pile-supported Embankment for a High-Speed Rail

Rashad Alsirawan,
Edina Koch

Abstract: Geosynthetic-Reinforced-Pile-Supported (GRPS) embankments are a trustworthy option ideal to support the railways over soft soils. They are widely used for the time-bound infrastructure projects. The majority of earlier research concentrated on the analysis of the GRPS embankments under static loads while the studies on the behavior of these constructions under dynamic loads are scarce. The fundamental purpose of this study has been to better comprehend the dynamic behavior of GRPS embankments in terms of stres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling the dynamic behavior of soil has become essential to address numerous geotechnical issues. Whether it is a cyclic loading problem (e.g., machine foundations and loading of train [1]) or a more complicated irregular loading, such as earthquake site response analysis [2,3], the advancements in computer technology and faster processing speeds have facilitated the use of numerical modeling (e.g., finite element and finite difference methods [4]) for quicker and more efficient calibration of models. The use of semi-static and equivalent linear methods has many limitations related to the assumptions made to simplify the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling the dynamic behavior of soil has become essential to address numerous geotechnical issues. Whether it is a cyclic loading problem (e.g., machine foundations and loading of train [1]) or a more complicated irregular loading, such as earthquake site response analysis [2,3], the advancements in computer technology and faster processing speeds have facilitated the use of numerical modeling (e.g., finite element and finite difference methods [4]) for quicker and more efficient calibration of models. The use of semi-static and equivalent linear methods has many limitations related to the assumptions made to simplify the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%