2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic and static behaviors of multilayered angle-ply magnetoelectroelastic laminates with viscoelastic interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape of the basin mouth, the slope of the front magnetic isolation ring, the chamfer length of the magnetic isolation ring, the radial clearance between armature and the guide sleeve has great influences on the electromagnetic suction characteristics [24]. The values of l, θ, σ and δ respectively represent the depth of the basin mouth, the slope of the magnetic isolation ring, the chamfer length and the radial clearance between armature and guide sleeve, which are shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Static Characteristic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the basin mouth, the slope of the front magnetic isolation ring, the chamfer length of the magnetic isolation ring, the radial clearance between armature and the guide sleeve has great influences on the electromagnetic suction characteristics [24]. The values of l, θ, σ and δ respectively represent the depth of the basin mouth, the slope of the magnetic isolation ring, the chamfer length and the radial clearance between armature and guide sleeve, which are shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Static Characteristic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the plate being simply supported on its borders, the boundary conditions are defined as follows: where u x (x, y, z, t), u y (x, y, z, t), u z (x, y, z, t) are the elastic displacements, F (x, y, z, t) is the electric potential and c (x, y, z, t) is magnetic potential at the point (x, y, z). Based on the Fourier series (Ewolo Ngak et al, 2018;Qian et al, 2010), the solution components are assumed in the following form:…”
Section: Dynamic Solution Of Multilayered Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presented in three conferences (Hamidi et al, 2019a(Hamidi et al, , 2019b(Hamidi et al, , 2019c the results of the 3D modeling of the static and dynamic behavior for multilayered MEE plate with viscoelastic interfaces based on a Winkler-Pasternak elastic support using space state method. Manyo Manyo et al (2019) treated a 3D-dynamic modeling of cross-ply MEE laminates based on the pseudo-Stroh formalism, Ewolo Ngak et al (2018Ngak et al ( , 2019 studied a dynamic analysis of multilayered magnetoelectroelastic plates based on a pseudo-Stroh formalism and Lagrange polynomials (Ewolo Ngak et al, 2019) and using state space approach and the Lagrange polynomial interpolation (Ewolo Ngak et al, 2018), Aljinaidi et al (2016) developed a visco-MEE effective properties' modeling for multi-phase and multi-coated magnetoelectroelastic, Ajdour et al (2016) analyzed a loaded multilayered MEE using Mori-Tanaka approach and pseudo-Stroh formalism. Zaki et al (2014Zaki et al ( , 2018 treated the static and dynamic behavior of multilayered elastic plates with interface effect and different orthotropic angles of fibers, resting on the Winkler-Pasternak elastic foundation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%