2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06895.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic association of MLL1, H3K4 trimethylation with chromatin and Hox gene expression during the cell cycle

Abstract: Mixed lineage leukemias (MLLs) are histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4)‐specific methylases that play a critical role in regulating gene expression in humans. As chromatin condensation, relaxation and differential gene expression are keys to correct cell cycle progression, we analyzed the dynamic association of MLL and H3K4 trimethylation at different stages of the cell cycle. Interestingly, MLL1, which is normally associated with transcriptionally active chromatins (G1 phase), dissociates from condensed mitotic chro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in contrast to recent immunofluorescence-based experiments reporting that OCT4 does not bind to mitotic chromosomes (Galonska et al 2014). However, several studies reported unclear (Caravaca et al 2013) or false negative results (Chen et al 2002;Blobel et al 2009;Mishra et al 2009;Wu et al 2015) when using immunofluorescence to assess MCB, which was suggested to be due to limited accessibility of epitopes to antibodies within the dense mitotic environment (Chen et al 2002;Kadauke and Blobel 2013;Wu et al 2015) but also formaldehyde fixation artifacts (Pallier et al 2003;Kumar et al 2008). Similar to previous reports on other transcription factors binding to mitotic chromosomes (Pallier et al 2003;Kumar et al 2008;Lerner et al 2016), we were unable to observe mitotic chromosome localization of SOX2 and OCT4 after formaldehyde fixation (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in contrast to recent immunofluorescence-based experiments reporting that OCT4 does not bind to mitotic chromosomes (Galonska et al 2014). However, several studies reported unclear (Caravaca et al 2013) or false negative results (Chen et al 2002;Blobel et al 2009;Mishra et al 2009;Wu et al 2015) when using immunofluorescence to assess MCB, which was suggested to be due to limited accessibility of epitopes to antibodies within the dense mitotic environment (Chen et al 2002;Kadauke and Blobel 2013;Wu et al 2015) but also formaldehyde fixation artifacts (Pallier et al 2003;Kumar et al 2008). Similar to previous reports on other transcription factors binding to mitotic chromosomes (Pallier et al 2003;Kumar et al 2008;Lerner et al 2016), we were unable to observe mitotic chromosome localization of SOX2 and OCT4 after formaldehyde fixation (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…40 Evidence from other systems suggest that Mll plays a role in G 2 /M progression, because HeLa cells transfected with an MLL1-antisense-oligoenucletide exhibit an increased percentage of cells in G 2 /M. 41 Analogously, knockdown of Mll5 in HeLa cells resulted in G 2 /M arrest due to increased p21 expression. 42 CD41 ϩ CD45 Ϫ c-kit ϩ and CD41 ϩ CD45 ϩ c-kit ϩ show a statistically significant accumulation of cells in the G 2 phase of the cell cycle, and these observed results suggest that G 2 accumulation by Hhex Ϫ/Ϫ progenitors may in part be due to reduced Mll expression (Table 1; Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was performed using an EZ Chip Chromatin immunoprecipitation kit (Upstate, Billerica, MA, USA) as described previously (Ansari et al 2008, Mishra et al 2009). In brief, estrogen-treated and control cells (JAR) were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, lysed, and sonicated to shear the chromatin.…”
Section: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%