2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.5192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic association of trigger factor with protein substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
53
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the presence of TF counteracted the proteolysis of all non-native arrested polypeptides tested. Consistent with the rapid mode of TF substrate binding and release, which is required for the efficient folding of proteins on the time scale of seconds up to minutes (29), the protection provided by TF was transient in all cases tested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In contrast, the presence of TF counteracted the proteolysis of all non-native arrested polypeptides tested. Consistent with the rapid mode of TF substrate binding and release, which is required for the efficient folding of proteins on the time scale of seconds up to minutes (29), the protection provided by TF was transient in all cases tested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, proline isomerization can often be coupled to folding (36,50,51). With increasing TF concentration, the rate of folding was reduced as TF apparently binds and traps folding intermediates of GFPuv, as has been observed for other TF substrates (35,37,50). In this scenario, the limiting step in folding may involve escape from TF to fold in solution, or could reflect the slow folding of GFPuv while bound to TF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We suggest that the k cat value is related with the dissociation of the substrate protein from the chaperone binding site and its transfer to the prolyl isomerase site. Permanently unfolded substrate proteins dissociate from the chaperone domain of trigger factor with a rate of approximately 8 s Ϫ1 (52). k cat is approximately fivefold lower, probably because dissociation from the chaperone site does not always lead to productive substrate transfer to the prolyl isomerase site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%