2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0478-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic balance and instrumented gait variables are independent predictors of falls following stroke

Abstract: BackgroundFalls are common following stroke and are frequently related to deficits in balance and mobility. This study aimed to investigate the predictive strength of gait and balance variables for evaluating post-stroke falls risk over 12 months following rehabilitation discharge.MethodsA prospective cohort study was undertaken in inpatient rehabilitation centres based in Australia and Singapore. A consecutive sample of 81 individuals (mean age 63 years; median 24 days post stroke) were assessed within one we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
90
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
90
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the other perturbation directions are concerned weak and statistically insignificant relations were found indicating that these outcome measures do not provide information on abilities to appropriately react to unexpected loss of balance during slow walking in the backward, inward and outward directions. Some prospective studies have suggested that the TUG clinical outcome measure may be a good predictor of a potential fall in the stroke population [16,32]. The results of our study have shown that TUG was to some extent related to the abilities of the tested group of post-stroke subjects to react to forward and backward perturbations where the obtained Spearman correlation coefficients were statistically significant.…”
Section: Clinical Outcome Measuressupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the other perturbation directions are concerned weak and statistically insignificant relations were found indicating that these outcome measures do not provide information on abilities to appropriately react to unexpected loss of balance during slow walking in the backward, inward and outward directions. Some prospective studies have suggested that the TUG clinical outcome measure may be a good predictor of a potential fall in the stroke population [16,32]. The results of our study have shown that TUG was to some extent related to the abilities of the tested group of post-stroke subjects to react to forward and backward perturbations where the obtained Spearman correlation coefficients were statistically significant.…”
Section: Clinical Outcome Measuressupporting
confidence: 66%
“…There are no clinical outcome measures to assess the ability of post-stroke subjects to cope with unexpected perturbations during walking. Fall risk prediction was often addressed in relation to various clinical outcome measures, which provide information about the performance of post-stroke subjects in terms of motor abilities and cognitive aspects [15][16][17]. The Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were suggested as reliable and valid assessment tools for predicting falls in moderately-functioning post-stroke subjects [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas other parameters of gait variability are usually enhanced in fallers vs. non-fallers in healthy elderly fallers 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10]42 , mediolateral variability of the COP was reduced in fallers vs. non fallers in our study. This finding conforms to a previous study that investigated mediolateral gait dynamics during walking in stroke survivors: the authors reported reduced mediolateral pelvis displacement in fallers vs. non-fallers with chronic stroke 43 . Reduced mediolateral variability might be an adaptation to stabilize the gait pattern which is also found in fall-prone populations other than stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As the other perturbation directions are concerned weak and statistically insigni cant relations were found indicating that these outcome measures do not provide information on abilities to appropriately react to unexpected loss of balance during slow walking in the backward, inward and outward directions. Some prospective studies have suggested that the TUG clinical outcome measure may be a good predictor of a potential fall in the stroke population [16,32]. The results of our study have shown that TUG was to some extent related to the abilities of the tested group of post-stroke subjects to react to forward and backward perturbations where the obtained Spearman correlation coe cients were statistically signi cant.…”
Section: Clinical Outcome Measuressupporting
confidence: 63%