2020
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Balance Evaluation: Reliability and Validity of a Computerized Wobble Board

Abstract: Computerized Wobble Boards (WB) are inexpensive, transportable and user-friendly devices to objectively quantify the dynamic balance performances out of laboratory settings, although it has not been established if they are reliable and valid tools. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of a computerized WB. Thirty-nine (18 female, 21 male) young adults (age: 23.3±2.1years; body mass: 65.9±1.8kg; height: 168.2±8.8cm; leg length: 78.8±5.7cm; BMI: 23.2±2.1kg·m) partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computerized WBs have been recently considered useful, precise, and reliable device for balance assessment showing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.65 to 0.89 in healthy subjects [ 14 ] and 0.58 and 0.84 in CAI individuals [ 2 ]. However, to fulfill the lack of accurate surrogate methods that might substitute computerized WB during balance evaluation in clinical practice, in this study a novel approach was favored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computerized WBs have been recently considered useful, precise, and reliable device for balance assessment showing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.65 to 0.89 in healthy subjects [ 14 ] and 0.58 and 0.84 in CAI individuals [ 2 ]. However, to fulfill the lack of accurate surrogate methods that might substitute computerized WB during balance evaluation in clinical practice, in this study a novel approach was favored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balance control is often assessed to evaluate changes after rehabilitation training intervention, deficits from previous ankle sprains and detect risk of reinjury in individuals with CAI [ 7 , 10 , 11 ]. Among the different methodologies, wobble boards (WBs), unstable platform generally used for proprioceptive training and rehabilitation protocols [ 6 , 12 , 13 ], have been recently computerized with accelerometers and connected to a computer to show reliable real-time data on balance in healthy and CAI individuals [ 2 , 14 , 15 ]. These systems proved to be easy to set up, collect and interpret data and offer the potential to monitor individuals’ dynamic balance during large-scale evaluation, also in field settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the transfer of the training adaptations principle, the concurrent presence of resistance exercises and instability might provide a more effective transfer of functional adaptations needed during the activities of daily living [58]. Although unstable surfaces and unbalanced conditions (i.e., Swiss balls, inflated discs, wobble boards, and suspension slings) have been mainly used for dynamic balance assessment and training in healthy, injured, and old subjects [59][60][61][62][63][64], they have been recently used also for strength gains purposes [58,65]. Despite extensive literature existing on the impact of instability resistance training on balance, stability, and strength [64,65], no experimental data are available on the functional training adaptations associated with isoinertial resistance training under unstable conditions in older populations.…”
Section: Highlight By Cristina Cortis and Andrea Fuscomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handy and validated alternative with fair to excellent reliability is found in computerized wobble boards (WBs) [20]. WBs are unstable platforms frequently used in clinical and therapeutic settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, classical assessment of the CoP when standing on a force platform can also be applied to standing on a WB [21]. Poor correlation between WB performance and the outcome of one of the most frequently used validated balance tests, the Y Balance Test [20], can be explained by the complexity of the underlying mechanisms of postural control [14] and different test-specific skills of postural control [20]. Since WBs are a common tool in sprain prevention programs [5] and are suitable for balance assessment in individuals with chronic ankle instability [16], their usage is reasonable for the context of the current study (i.e., injury prevention in high-risk individuals).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%