2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.j057186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Behavior and Gust Simulation in an Unsteady Flow Wind Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wei et al (2019) generated gusts with peak-to-peak deflection angles of only 4.5°, but used an active turbulence grid that can produce sinusoidal variations in either one or two directions. Another unique setup is that of a cross-flow passage on an unsteady flow wind tunnel so that flow disturbances can be produced in two directions: ∼10°of flow deflection in the transverse direction and ∼10% variation in the freestream direction (He & Williams 2020, He et al 2021, Rennie et al 2019.…”
Section: Experimental Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al (2019) generated gusts with peak-to-peak deflection angles of only 4.5°, but used an active turbulence grid that can produce sinusoidal variations in either one or two directions. Another unique setup is that of a cross-flow passage on an unsteady flow wind tunnel so that flow disturbances can be produced in two directions: ∼10°of flow deflection in the transverse direction and ∼10% variation in the freestream direction (He & Williams 2020, He et al 2021, Rennie et al 2019.…”
Section: Experimental Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gust device based on pitching blades has also been widely used in other recent studies (Williams & King 2018; Mark Rennie et al. 2019; Li, Li & Shi 2021). The spacing between the two blades is 380 mm.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both blades are constructed from a combination of resin material and carbon fibre plates, providing them with ample rigidity. This gust device based on pitching blades has also been widely used in other recent studies (Williams & King 2018;Mark Rennie et al 2019;Li, Li & Shi 2021). The spacing between the two blades is 380 mm.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%