It is critical to understand the dynamic tensile failure of confined rocks in many rock engineering applications, such as underground blasting in mining projects. To simulate the in situ stress state of underground rocks, a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar system is utilized to load Brazilian disc (BD) samples hydrostatically, and then exert dynamic load to the sample by impacting the striker on the incident bar. The pulse shaper technique is used to generate a slowly rising stress wave to facilitate the dynamic force balance in the tests. Five groups of Laurentian granite BD samples (with static BD tensile strength of 12.8 MPa) under the hydrostatic confinement of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 MPa were tested with different loading rates. The result shows that the dynamic tensile strength increases with the hydrostatic confining pressure. It is also observed that under the same hydrostatic pressure, the dynamic tensile strength increases with the loading rate, revealing the so-called rate dependency for engineering materials. Furthermore, the increment of the tensile strength decreases with the hydrostatic confinement, which resembles the static tensile behavior of rock under confining pressure, as reported in the literature. The recovered samples are examined using X-ray micro-computed tomography method and the observed crack pattern is consistent with the experimental result. Keywords Dynamic tensile strength Ă Hydrostatic confinement Ă Brazilian disc Ă SHPB Ă Rate dependence Ă X-ray CT Abbreviations SHPB Split Hopkinson pressure bar BD Brazilian disc CT Computed tomography LG Laurentian granite ISRM International Society for Rock Mechanics
List of SymbolsA b Cross-sectional area of the bars (mm 2 ) A s Contact area between the sample and the transmitted bar (mm 2 ) r 0 Pump oil pressure (MPa) r 1 Stresses of the sample at the transmitted bar end (MPa) r 2 Stresses of the sample at the incident bar end (MPa) e i Incident strain wave e r Reflected strain wave e t Transmitted strain wave P 1 Force on incident end of the Brazilian disc specimen (N) P 2 Force on transmitted end of the Brazilian disc specimen (N) E b Young's modulus of the bars (GPa) B Thickness of the Brazilian disc specimen (mm) D Diameter of the Brazilian disc specimen (mm) r Tensile stress at the center of the Brazilian disc specimen (MPa) S Dynamic tensile strength of the Brazilian disc specimen (MPa) S 0 Static Brazilian tensile strength of Laurentian granite (MPa) & Kaiwen Xia