2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Cities can be defined as smart if they include the following elements: smart economy, smart mobility, smart environment, smart people, smart living and smart governance [23,24]. The literature, however, provides a number of definitions that are mainly focused on the technological aspect [25][26][27][28][29][30]. It should be noted that only by taking due account of other areas 2 of 24 and their mutual relations will smart cities be able to achieve effective implementation and long term success [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cities can be defined as smart if they include the following elements: smart economy, smart mobility, smart environment, smart people, smart living and smart governance [23,24]. The literature, however, provides a number of definitions that are mainly focused on the technological aspect [25][26][27][28][29][30]. It should be noted that only by taking due account of other areas 2 of 24 and their mutual relations will smart cities be able to achieve effective implementation and long term success [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous closely related definitions of smart cities have been proposed over the past decade, with a plethora of differing terms and explanations suggesting a lack of a unified and accepted definition (Chong et al 2018;Schaffers et al 2012;Zhuhadar et al 2017). Studies tend to reference a number of alternative terms within the literature, such as: digital cities (Sun and Poole, 2010;Keegan et al 2012), intelligent cities (Tan, 1999), wired cities (Targowski, 1990), information city (Stolfi & Sussman, 2001;Sproull & Patterson, 2004;Fietkiewicz et al 2017), ubiquitous cities (Shin, 2009) and sensing city (Mone, 2015).…”
Section: Exploring the Definitions Of Smart Cities Within The Is Litementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keegan et al (2012) proposed that a city will be an effective functioning entity when it integrates disparate elements such as traffic monitoring, public transportation, utility distribution, health service management, leisure and tourism, entertainment, e-government, emergency response and commerce. Studies define these services as needing to be fully integrated within a holistic system either partly or fully accessible by the general public (Chong et al 2018;Keegan et al 2012). Schuurman et al (2012) focused on technology and citizens in the context of collaborative digital environments and how these factors can facilitate the development of innovative applications with an emphasis on human capital rather than an expectation that digitalization alone can transform cities.…”
Section: P74mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors have attempted to formulate the definition of a "smart city" by binding it with different terms, which is indicative of the lack of a uniform or widely accepted definition (Schaffers et al, 2012;Zhuhadat et al, 2017;Chong et al, 2018). In publications dealing with the subject of a "smart city", there are many alternative terms for this concept, such as: "digital city" (Tan, 1999), "wired city" (Targowski, 1990), "information city" (Fietkiewicz et al, 2017;Sproull & Patterson, 2004;Stolfi & Sussman, 2001), "ubiquitous city" (Shin, 2009), "sensing city" (Mone, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%