2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10596-007-9050-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic capillary effects in heterogeneous porous media

Abstract: In standard multi-phase flow models on porous media, a capillary pressure saturation relationship developed under static conditions is assumed. Recent experiments have shown that this static relationship cannot explain dynamic effects as seen for example in outflow experiments. In this paper, we use a static capillary pressure model and a dynamic capillary pressure model based on the concept of Hassanizadeh and Gray and examine the behavior with respect to material interfaces. We introduce a new numerical sche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, a number of studies have discussed the significance of dynamic capillary pressure and s in different circumstances. 7,[19][20][21]23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] For example, hysteretic dynamic effect in the capillary pressure relationship was discussed in a theoretical study by Beliaev and Hassanizadeh 19 . Hassanizadeh et al 20 interpreted the imbibition experiments (displacement of oil by water) of Kalaydjian 44 Pa s for MI, which imply that the dynamic coefficient was found to be higher for imbibition than that for drainage by Hassanizadeh et al 21 Another study which is relevant to the current article was conducted by Sakaki et al 23 Sakaki et al conducted PD, MD, and MI experiments and measured s values for these three cases for a single porous domain of saturated hydraulic conductivity 0.016 cm/s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, a number of studies have discussed the significance of dynamic capillary pressure and s in different circumstances. 7,[19][20][21]23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] For example, hysteretic dynamic effect in the capillary pressure relationship was discussed in a theoretical study by Beliaev and Hassanizadeh 19 . Hassanizadeh et al 20 interpreted the imbibition experiments (displacement of oil by water) of Kalaydjian 44 Pa s for MI, which imply that the dynamic coefficient was found to be higher for imbibition than that for drainage by Hassanizadeh et al 21 Another study which is relevant to the current article was conducted by Sakaki et al 23 Sakaki et al conducted PD, MD, and MI experiments and measured s values for these three cases for a single porous domain of saturated hydraulic conductivity 0.016 cm/s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All results refer to the case J (1) > 0, hence to the entry pressure model. If instead, J (1) = 0 (no entry pressure), s * = 1 and the analysis before leads to s − < 1, and p − (t) = p + (t) for all t > 0 (see Helmig et al 2007). …”
Section: Proposition 2 Assume Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of vanishing capillary effects and the connection to hyperbolic conservation laws is studied in Duijn et al ( , 2013. For dynamic capillarity models in the heterogeneous case, but in the absence of an entry pressure, numerical schemes are discussed in Helmig et al (2007). This situation is similar to the case analyzed in Cuesta and Pop (2009), where the interface is replaced by a discontinuity in the initial conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the behavior of fluid in tight reservoir still awaits to be revealed. To investigate the fluid performance in tight clastic rock reservoir, some experiments and studies returned back to the essential issues, including the pore-throat structure and physical interaction of fluid-pore-wall in the tight reservoir [6,10,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, the pore-throat structures are various significantly in tight clastic rock reservoir and the fluid flow inside needs to be particularly concerned [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%