2018
DOI: 10.1177/0271678x18806107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation estimates derived from near infrared spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler are similar after correction for transit time and blood flow and blood volume oscillations

Abstract: We analysed mean arterial blood pressure, cerebral blood flow velocity, oxygenated haemoglobin and deoxygenated haemoglobin signals to estimate dynamic cerebral autoregulation. We compared macrovascular (mean arterial blood pressure-cerebral blood flow velocity) and microvascular (oxygenated haemoglobin-deoxygenated haemoglobin) dynamic cerebral autoregulation estimates during three different conditions: rest, mild hypocapnia and hypercapnia. Microvascular dynamic cerebral autoregulation estimates were created… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most studies of TFA assessment of dynamic CA were performed with transcranial Doppler ultrasound, similar considerations above would also apply to other alternative methods for measuring CBF such as near infrared spectroscopy (Elting et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies of TFA assessment of dynamic CA were performed with transcranial Doppler ultrasound, similar considerations above would also apply to other alternative methods for measuring CBF such as near infrared spectroscopy (Elting et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second result of our study was that, irrespective of the exact mechanism for the cerebrovascular resistance increase, the mechanisms of the cerebrovascular system consisted of compromised dynamics of CA in the BP-CBFV system, and normal dynamics of cerebral blood flow regulation at the capillary level. If HBP patients are sufficiently treated, our overall findings indicate that the extent of the hemodynamic compromise of the resistance vessels does not exceed a point at which the capillary compensatory mechanisms become effective, such as shortening of the mean transit time by opening up of functional shortcuts due to capillary transit time homogenization 9,12,37 or of prolongation the mean transit time 15,38,39 via delaying venous outflow 15 . Our results at the www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ capillary level support recent CBF studies which demonstrate that cerebral hypoperfusion is not always present in patients with HBP 29,40,41 , and that an intensive BP lowering was tolerated well by patients with severe SVD 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Under resting conditions, the differences in phase between BP or CBFV and [oxHb] or [deoxHb] range between 15 and 55° for BP-[oxHb], between 44 and 84° for CBFV-[oxHb], between 209 and 265° for BP-[deoxHb], and about 270° for the CBFV-[deoxHb] relationship (Reinhard et al, 2006; Cheng et al, 2012; Phillip et al, 2012; Fantini, 2014; Müller et al, 2016; Elting et al, 2018). The phase shift differences depend mostly on the mathematical approach used, data preparation, and the use of either spontaneous oscillatory CBF changes or enforced CBF changes by, for example, forced breathing (Reinhard et al, 2003, 2006; Cheng et al, 2012; Phillip et al, 2012; Müller et al, 2016; Elting et al, 2018). The reported mean transit times range between 190° (corresponding to 5.15 s at 0.1 Hz) in the investigation of Reinhard et al (2006), 205° in our present investigation (corresponding to 5.6 s), and 120° (corresponding to 3.2 s) in Elting et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase shift differences depend mostly on the mathematical approach used, data preparation, and the use of either spontaneous oscillatory CBF changes or enforced CBF changes by, for example, forced breathing (Reinhard et al, 2003, 2006; Cheng et al, 2012; Phillip et al, 2012; Müller et al, 2016; Elting et al, 2018). The reported mean transit times range between 190° (corresponding to 5.15 s at 0.1 Hz) in the investigation of Reinhard et al (2006), 205° in our present investigation (corresponding to 5.6 s), and 120° (corresponding to 3.2 s) in Elting et al (2018). Although these transit time differences appear large, they are in the normal range when cerebral blood flow studies using positron emission tomography or dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI are considered for comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation