2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/424381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Changes, Cut-Off Points, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Laboratory Data to Differentiate Macrophage Activation Syndrome from Active Disease

Abstract: Purpose. To compare the laboratory data and changes in these data between patients with MAS and patients with flare-up of the autoimmune diseases. Methods. In a prospective study, the static laboratory data and dynamic changes in the selected data in 17 consecutive patients with MAS and 53 patients with active disease of SJIA, PJIA, Kawasaki disease, and SLE were compared. The ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate cut-off points, sensitivity, and specificity of the static and dynamic laboratory data to diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine papers were excluded after full text screening. Two papers on biomarkers were excluded because data of sJIA patients with MAS were inseparably mixed with MAS in the context of other underlying diseases [ 14 , 15 ]. 7 papers assessing genetic associations of MAS in sJIA were excluded because these papers addressed possible genetic associations as possible underlying causes rather than as possible biomarkers for diagnosis, disease activity or treatment response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine papers were excluded after full text screening. Two papers on biomarkers were excluded because data of sJIA patients with MAS were inseparably mixed with MAS in the context of other underlying diseases [ 14 , 15 ]. 7 papers assessing genetic associations of MAS in sJIA were excluded because these papers addressed possible genetic associations as possible underlying causes rather than as possible biomarkers for diagnosis, disease activity or treatment response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies supported subtle laboratory alterations and monitoring of the laboratory changes, along with an early recognition of the clinical presentations for MAS onset; these were crucial for an early diagnosis of MAS 5,33,35,36. The laboratory parameters, including platelet count, as well as the aspartate and alanine aminotransferases, together with the ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, triglyceride, and d -dimer levels, showed >50% changes between a pre-MAS visit and MAS onset 10.…”
Section: Clinical and Laboratory Features: How To Recognize Mas Earlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, neutrophils and platelets may be within the laboratory normal range but it is the drop from previously elevated levels associated with acute infection or active autoimmune disease that may herald development of HLH 33. The paradoxically falling ESR despite increasing systemic inflammation is thought to be secondary to decreasing fibrinogen resulting from fibrinogen consumption and liver dysfunction 4.…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%