2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic changes in prefrontal cortex involvement during verbal episodic memory formation

Abstract: Highlights We investigated encoding-related post-stimulus brain activity in the prefrontal cortex with repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (r-TMS)  We delivered r-TMS during encoding while a word appeared on the screen, and at different points in time after its offset  r-TMS over the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex shortly after stimulus offset decreased subsequent memory accuracy  No effects were found when r-TMS was delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at any time point  The involv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 24 (14 females; mean age ± SD: 21 ± 3 years; range: 18-29 years) took part in Experiment 1; 18 (15 females; mean age ± SD: 22 ± 3 years; range: 19-29 years) took part in Experiment 2; and 24 (17 females; mean age ± SD: 20 ± 1 year; range: 18-23 years) took part in Experiment 3. For the rTMS experiments (Experiments 1 and 3), we calculated that a minimum of 22 participants was required to detect an effect size of d = 0.74 (as in Galli et al 2017, assuming α = 0.05 and 1ß = 0.95, one-tailed paired-samples t-test), and adjusted the final sample size upwards to account for possible attrition rate. Two subjects in Experiment 1 and one subject in Experiment 3 were tested but excluded from the analyses due to low memory performance based on a-priori determined exclusion criteria (± 2 SD from the average).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, 24 (14 females; mean age ± SD: 21 ± 3 years; range: 18-29 years) took part in Experiment 1; 18 (15 females; mean age ± SD: 22 ± 3 years; range: 19-29 years) took part in Experiment 2; and 24 (17 females; mean age ± SD: 20 ± 1 year; range: 18-23 years) took part in Experiment 3. For the rTMS experiments (Experiments 1 and 3), we calculated that a minimum of 22 participants was required to detect an effect size of d = 0.74 (as in Galli et al 2017, assuming α = 0.05 and 1ß = 0.95, one-tailed paired-samples t-test), and adjusted the final sample size upwards to account for possible attrition rate. Two subjects in Experiment 1 and one subject in Experiment 3 were tested but excluded from the analyses due to low memory performance based on a-priori determined exclusion criteria (± 2 SD from the average).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments followed a repeated measures design with rTMS condition as the within-subjects factor. In our previous work (Galli et al, 2017) the time of rTMS administration varied while the duration of word stimuli was set to 1000 ms in all conditions. As a consequence, it was not possible to ascertain whether rTMS effects observed immediately after word offset were driven by the offset itself, or by offset-invariant post-stimulus processes occurring around 1000 ms after the onset of the words, therefore temporally coinciding with word offset.…”
Section: Rtms Protocol and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations