2018
DOI: 10.1017/s003329171800212x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic changes in white matter microstructure in anorexia nervosa: findings from a longitudinal study

Abstract: Our findings reveal that dynamic, bidirectional changes in WM microstructure in young underweight patients with AN can be reversed with brief weight restoration therapy. These results parallel those previously observed in GM and suggest that alterations in WM in non-chronic AN are also state-dependent and rapidly reversible with successful intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
8
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another speculative explanation for the absence of group differences in brain function in the current weight-recovered/healthy controls sample might be that potential scar effects were not detectable in our relatively young sample with a relatively short duration of illness (Table 1) or normalization of brain structure following weight recovery. 57 Other possibilities we cannot rule out may be sampling error or insufficient statistical power. Although sufficient power can be reasonably assumed on the basis of previous findings of group differences in smaller samples (including our own) with the same task, 11,18,19 the absence of evidence for group differences between weight-recovered participants with anorexia and healthy controls should not be misinterpreted as proof that value-based decision-making is necessarily "normal" following long-term weight recovery.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another speculative explanation for the absence of group differences in brain function in the current weight-recovered/healthy controls sample might be that potential scar effects were not detectable in our relatively young sample with a relatively short duration of illness (Table 1) or normalization of brain structure following weight recovery. 57 Other possibilities we cannot rule out may be sampling error or insufficient statistical power. Although sufficient power can be reasonably assumed on the basis of previous findings of group differences in smaller samples (including our own) with the same task, 11,18,19 the absence of evidence for group differences between weight-recovered participants with anorexia and healthy controls should not be misinterpreted as proof that value-based decision-making is necessarily "normal" following long-term weight recovery.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 24 studies derived from the systematic review, only the studies conducted among current AN patients were considered for the analysis. Only 10 articles reported a significant FA alteration in AN patients and were included in the ALE-analysis, in accordance with the ALEanalysis standards (Eickhoff et al, 2009;Frank et al, 2013;Frieling et al, 2012;Gaudio et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2017;Kazlouski et al, 2011;Nagahara et al, 2014;Phillipou, Carruthers, et al, 2018;von Schwanenflug et al, 2019;Via et al, 2014;Vogel et al, 2016). Five studies were excluded because they did not report whole brain cluster coordinates of increased or decreased FA (Cha et al, 2016;Frank et al, 2016;Miles et al, 2018;Pfuhl et al, 2016;Travis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ale-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, their results are not consistent. Most studies report lower FA in widespread WM regions, including the corpus callosum (CC) (Frieling et al, 2012;Frank et al, 2013;Shott et al, 2016;Gaudio et al, 2017;Phillipou et al, 2018;von Schwanenflug et al, 2019), fornix fibers (Kazlouski et al, 2011;Frank et al, 2013;Gaudio et al, 2017), thalamus (Frieling et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2017), cingulum (Kazlouski et al, 2011;Frank et al, 2013), posterior thalamic radiation (PTR) (Phillipou et al, 2018), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) (Via et al, 2014), fronto-occipital fasciculus (FOF) (Kazlouski et al, 2011;Via et al, 2014), corona radiation (Shott et al, 2016;Phillipou et al, 2018) and cerebellum (Nagahara et al, 2014;Shott et al, 2016). Five studies, however, observed no significant FA differences between AN patients and HC (Yau et al, 2013;Cha et al, 2016;Pfuhl et al, 2016;Bang et al, 2018;Olivo and Swenne, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%