2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11044-019-09677-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic computation for rigid–flexible multibody systems with hybrid uncertainty of randomness and interval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, another objective of the UP is to calculate the lower and upper bounds of the mean and variance of the concerned responses [33]. In some hybrid-uncertainty problems, the error bars [34] are used to evaluate the overall uncertain extent of the response, which is defined as follows:…”
Section: Uncertainty Propagation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, another objective of the UP is to calculate the lower and upper bounds of the mean and variance of the concerned responses [33]. In some hybrid-uncertainty problems, the error bars [34] are used to evaluate the overall uncertain extent of the response, which is defined as follows:…”
Section: Uncertainty Propagation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [33] developed the Polynomial-Chaos-Chebyshev-Interval (PCCI) method, where the PCE theory that accounts for the random variables is integrated with the Chebyshev method that handles the interval uncertainty. Then Wu et al [34] improved the method and applied it to rigid-flexible multibody systems. Fu et al [35] also proposed a UP method for accelerating unbalanced rotating systems with both random and interval variables, which is also based on PEC theory and the Chebyshev method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the auxiliary algorithms are applied to find the extreme values of the surrogate model, and obtain the interval results of the dynamic response. The common auxiliary algorithms include IA [35,42,43], genetic algorithm (GA) [40,44,45] and SM [46][47][48]39]. IA has the fastest computing velocity, but often yields calculation errors due to the wrapping effect, especially when the dynamic response is largely uncertain and nonlinear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. Wu et al 40 proposed a new hybrid uncertain computational method, two evaluation indices namely interval mean and interval error bar, are presented to quantify the system response, and an orthogonal series expansion method, termed as improved Polynomial‐Chaos‐Chebyshev‐Interval (PCCI) method, which solves the random and interval uncertainty under one integral framework. Zheng et al 41 develop a new robust topology optimization method based on level sets for structures subject to hybrid uncertainties, with a more efficient Karhunen‐Loève hyperbolic PCCI method to conduct the hybrid uncertain analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%