2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-01987-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography diagnosis of primary liver cancers using transfer learning of pretrained convolutional neural networks: Is registration of multiphasic images necessary?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most researchers and clinicians require a process of trial and error to find out promising AI techniques fitting their target images 24 . The three models assessed in this study, AlexNet, VGG16, and InceptionV3, have been actively applied to the task of medical image classification 8,25,26 . More advanced models may be applicable, but such models generally require greater computational power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researchers and clinicians require a process of trial and error to find out promising AI techniques fitting their target images 24 . The three models assessed in this study, AlexNet, VGG16, and InceptionV3, have been actively applied to the task of medical image classification 8,25,26 . More advanced models may be applicable, but such models generally require greater computational power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a particularly good practice of science because solutions are shared online for the sake of reproducibility with the dataset. Popular datasets are listed in alphabetical order: BRATS is a dataset that provides The search string applied in Web of Science database was as follows: TS=("CNN" OR "convolutional") AND TS=("medical imag*" OR "clinical imag*" OR "biomedical imag*") AND TS=("transfer learning" OR "pre-trained" OR "pretrained") NOT TS=("novel" OR "propose") Alimentary system Feature extractor [34,35] Fine-tuning scratch [36,37] Bones Feature extractor [38] Genital systems Fine-tuning scratch [39] Nervous system Many [40] Respiratory system Feature extractor [41] Feature extractor hybrid [42] Fine-tuning scratch [43][44][45] Many [46,47] Sense organs Feature extractor [48] Thoracic cavity Feature extractor [49] Endoscopy Alimentary system Feature extractor [50,51] Fine-tuning scratch [52][53][54] Many [55] Mammographic Integumentary system Feature extractor [2]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this work also shows that CT CNN models can improve accuracy, sensitivity and specificity compared to using CT alone (0.811–0.833, 0.744–0.923, and 0.725–0.941 vs. 0.543–0.676, 0.316–0.541 and 0.914, respectively). On a similar note, Yamada et al [ 42 ] proposed transfer learning of pre-trained CNNs (GoogLeNet and Inception-v3) on a dataset of 215 patients with histologically proven primary liver cancers. Their approach consisted in splitting in a RGB system the results of different CT phases, obtaining in each similar accuracy to experienced abdominal radiologists and higher than general radiologists.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%