2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-009-0271-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic corner frequency in source spectral model for stochastic synthesis of ground motion

Abstract: The static corner frequency and dynamic corner frequency in stochastic synthesis of ground motion from finite-fault modeling are introduced, and conceptual disadvantages of the two are discussed in this paper. Furthermore, the non-uniform radiation of seismic wave on the fault plane, as well as the trend of the larger rupture area, the lower corner frequency, can be described by the source spectral model developed by the authors. A new dynamic corner frequency can be developed directly from the model. The depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the backward effect takes place at the time of propagation of rupture from a site that produces low amplitudes and long duration motions in the long term (Sun, 2010). The ORR station had undervalued response spectra nearly during the whole period, which conformed to the results obtained by Beresnev and Atkinson (1998b) and Sun et al (2009). The reasons for these differences may be attributed to the fact that the selected site amplification factor fail to describe the local geological conditions, which may require complete site data for analysis.…”
Section: Simulation Results Of the Northridge Earthquakesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the backward effect takes place at the time of propagation of rupture from a site that produces low amplitudes and long duration motions in the long term (Sun, 2010). The ORR station had undervalued response spectra nearly during the whole period, which conformed to the results obtained by Beresnev and Atkinson (1998b) and Sun et al (2009). The reasons for these differences may be attributed to the fact that the selected site amplification factor fail to describe the local geological conditions, which may require complete site data for analysis.…”
Section: Simulation Results Of the Northridge Earthquakesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the results of the two models are similar. In the case of a few stations, the simulated results of the two models are significantly different from the observed results, which is found to be consistent with the results obtained by Sun et al (2009) and Beresnev and Atkinson (1998b). These differences may be caused by local site effects, topography, and basin geometry effects, which may require complete site data for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The stochastic finite-fault modeling technique has been developed to simulate ground motions near the epicenter of a large earthquake [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. In the modeling, the fault is divided into many subfaults, and the ground motion from the entire fault is obtained by summing the contributions from all subfaults with time lags.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%