2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cluster.2015.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic CPU Resource Allocation in Containerized Cloud Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of containers resource allocation has been investigated using time-slicing [25], Fuzzy [29], linear programming models [32], reinforcement learning [24]. Others authors also employ nonstandard techniques like vertical elasticity [5].…”
Section: Resource Allocation For Container-based Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem of containers resource allocation has been investigated using time-slicing [25], Fuzzy [29], linear programming models [32], reinforcement learning [24]. Others authors also employ nonstandard techniques like vertical elasticity [5].…”
Section: Resource Allocation For Container-based Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others authors also employ nonstandard techniques like vertical elasticity [5]. Most work considers only a single type of resource to allocate, i.e., CPU [25], with few exceptions [24,29]. Some work considers all resources aggregated in one single pool [24], while others [5,29] consider that they are distributed across different nodes, which complicates the allocation problem.…”
Section: Resource Allocation For Container-based Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DoCloud, a hybrid elasticity controller is proposed that uses proactive and reactive model to scale out and proactive model to scale down. Monsalve et al [24] proposed an approach that controls CPU shares of a container, this approach uses CFS scheduling mode. Nowadays, Docker can use all the CPU shares if there is not concurrency by other containers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the VM vertical elasticity, there are some works which focus on CPU resizing, e.g, (Lakew et al, 2014) and (Dawoud et al, 2012), while others concentrate on memory resizing, e.g., (Baruchi and Midorikawa, 2011) as well as combination of both such as the work of (Farokhi et al, 2015). (Monsalve et al, 2015) proposed an approach that controls CPU shares of a container, this approach uses CFS scheduling mode. Nowadays, Docker can use all the CPU shares if there is no concurrency by other containers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this paper addresses the combination of vertical elasticity of containers and vertical elasticity of VMs. Many works (Baruchi and Midorikawa, 2011), (Dawoud et al, 2012), (Farokhi et al, 2015) handle the vertical elasticity of VMs, other works (Monsalve et al, 2015), (Paraiso et al, 2016) manage the resources of containers. However, no attention was given to the coordination of both elasticities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%