2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-9166(16)30267-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Crushing Strength Analysis of Auxetic Honeycombs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their studies pointed out that the auxetic effects determines the impact response of the re-entrant honeycomb by affecting the crushing pattern. A similar conclusion was also reported by Xiuhui Hou et al [16], who attributed the superior impact resistance of auxetic honeycombs to the auxetic effect induced in the re-entrant topology.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Their studies pointed out that the auxetic effects determines the impact response of the re-entrant honeycomb by affecting the crushing pattern. A similar conclusion was also reported by Xiuhui Hou et al [16], who attributed the superior impact resistance of auxetic honeycombs to the auxetic effect induced in the re-entrant topology.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The energy absorption of a re-entrant structure when crushed by a rigid wall has been analysed [175], but not experimentally validated. Analytical formulae were however used to validate FEM suggestions that auxetic honeycombs have higher energy absorption than conventional honeycombs in crushing strength analysis [176]. When varying the impact energy on a jounce bumper [27,177], FEM closely matched experimental values for the material's Poisson's ratio and compressive modulus and the jounce bumper's force and displacement.…”
Section: Modelling Auxetic Materials and Structuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is evident form Figure 6 that the PDE with respect to the time of direction D1 is higher than that of D2. This can be justified to the auxetic effect that leads to more energy absorption [21]. In terms of the reaction force (Figure 7), D1 showed better performance with less RFd/P ratio, except for the final collapse reaction.…”
Section: Parametric Studymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The 3rd is the plateau region where plastic bending occurs. The last is the densification state, when the cell walls touch each other [21]. It is the plateau region that is important in characterizing the dynamic crushing of auxetic structures for energy absorbing applications [37].…”
Section: Final Properties Of the Ugadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation