1989
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198907000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic CT vs 0.5 T MR Imaging in the Detection of Surgically Proven Hepatic Metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detectability of liver metastases is especially important in patients with colorectal tumors (I, [16][17][18]. The number and location of these lesions are crucial factors for therapeutic decisions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detectability of liver metastases is especially important in patients with colorectal tumors (I, [16][17][18]. The number and location of these lesions are crucial factors for therapeutic decisions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several comparative studies have raised controversial viewpoints about the first-choice examination among computed tomography, computed tomography during arterial portography, ultrasonography, and MR for accurate detection of focal liver lesions. The detectability of liver metastases is especially important in patients with colorectal tumors (I, [16][17][18]. The number and location of these lesions are crucial factors for therapeutic decisions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI is known to provide excellent contrast resolution within soft tissues. Some studies have shown that MRI is superior to contrast-enhanced CT for detection (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) and characterization (5,7,9) of focal hepatic lesions. However, these studies did not utilize spiral CT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies performed at relatively low field strengths (less than 0.5 T) suggested that T1-weighted sequences were the most effective for detecting focal lesions (4,7,10). However, more recent studies performed at higher field strength have shown that T2-weighted sequences are more sensitive than T1-weighted sequences for lesion detection (10)(11)(12)(13) and characterization (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%