2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic demand response in smart buildings using an intelligent residential load management system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang and Wang [23] address the trade-off between energy consumption and comfort level of smart building occupants using an innovative multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm. Arun and Selvan [24] propose a real-time load scheduling heuristic algorithm aimed at reducing the electricity bill and keep the total consumption under maximum demand limit considering the operating dynamics of a large number of controllable and non-controllable loads. Similarly, Lee et al [25] present a hidden Markov model for the scheduling of shiftable loads in households equipped with storage systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang and Wang [23] address the trade-off between energy consumption and comfort level of smart building occupants using an innovative multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm. Arun and Selvan [24] propose a real-time load scheduling heuristic algorithm aimed at reducing the electricity bill and keep the total consumption under maximum demand limit considering the operating dynamics of a large number of controllable and non-controllable loads. Similarly, Lee et al [25] present a hidden Markov model for the scheduling of shiftable loads in households equipped with storage systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( )}, { * ( )}, % (0), ) (0), (0), (0) Procedure: 1 set t ← 0 2 iterate 3 get forecast data ( ), ( ), "#$ ( ), ! ( ), conditions % ( ), ) ( ), ( ), (t) 6solve the optimization problem (26) using(24) or (25) (Algorithm 2a or 2b) 7 apply only 0 ( + 1), % ( + 1), ) ( + 1), )! ( + 1), )* ( + 1), .!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are net expected power of prosumer n, internal buying price and internal selling price, respectively, during the interval t, and the functions f 1 and f 2 are the equality and inequality constraints describing the limits on load operating intervals and prosumer satisfaction, respectively [22]. In this study, BGA is used to optimise the objective function.…”
Section: Prosumer Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few of such approaches are by Nilotpal et al [6,11,12], wherein multiple AC scheduling problem has been modelled as a graph and solved using a fast greedy approach. Subsequently, a genetic algorithm-driven system for optimal load scheduling was proposed in [13][14][15], which describes their system's performance without and with local renewable generation, respectively. Li et al [16] have proposed an energy management system, which has dependency on solar PV power prediction.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the pseudocode, it can be inferred that algorithm calculates charging current using (13), where 98% of MDL has been kept to incorporate the minor fluctuations in real power…”
Section: Case Study 2: Ac With Dynamic Ev Charging (Second Control Almentioning
confidence: 99%