2015
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Design for Quality for Total Quality Advantage: A Benchmarking Case Study from Indian Automobile Manufacturing Sector

Abstract: This paper examines the design for quality aspect as not any static one time activity but a dynamic reality for the organisations. Authors developed and implemented a benchmarking tool for measuring quality design effectiveness by field survey. Even if mature, established and reputed organisations are time-tested for producing quality products, various index parameters were found where one company could prioritise their design improvement initiatives. This paper takes the design for quality issue beyond the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Customer involvement leads to improvement in the utilization of resources and the reduction of the overall costs involved (Schweisfurth & Raasch, 2015). If the design quality is improved as part of product development, the manufacturing costs are reduced (Pal & Jasial, 2015). Furthermore, improved product development performance will result in the minimization of scrap and rework costs thereby improving overall cost performance (Koufteros et al, 1998).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer involvement leads to improvement in the utilization of resources and the reduction of the overall costs involved (Schweisfurth & Raasch, 2015). If the design quality is improved as part of product development, the manufacturing costs are reduced (Pal & Jasial, 2015). Furthermore, improved product development performance will result in the minimization of scrap and rework costs thereby improving overall cost performance (Koufteros et al, 1998).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%