2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2021.3106042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Differential Pricing of High-Speed Railway Based on Improved GBDT Train Classification and Bootstrap Time Node Determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Su et al [17] built an optimization model for train ticket pricing decision variables based on a timedependent demand model and a passenger allocation method considering departure time and capacity constraints. Jing [18] constructed a dynamic simulation mechanism and dynamic differential pricing solution framework for passenger selection under differential pricing conditions based on an improved machine learning gradient boosting decision tree model. Wang et al [19] applied dynamic pricing to the pricing for refund service fees, dynamically charging for refunds based on the expected revenue produced by each ticket cancellation behavior, in order to compensate for the losses as much as possible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al [17] built an optimization model for train ticket pricing decision variables based on a timedependent demand model and a passenger allocation method considering departure time and capacity constraints. Jing [18] constructed a dynamic simulation mechanism and dynamic differential pricing solution framework for passenger selection under differential pricing conditions based on an improved machine learning gradient boosting decision tree model. Wang et al [19] applied dynamic pricing to the pricing for refund service fees, dynamically charging for refunds based on the expected revenue produced by each ticket cancellation behavior, in order to compensate for the losses as much as possible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al used the combined model of XGBoost and LSTM in the short-term traffic prediction of the base station [20]. Yun et al built a local optimal fusion model based on LSTM, LightGBM, and dynamic regression device [21]. Wang et al took Multivariable Linear Regression (MLR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), XGBoost, and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) as four seed models to establish a regression integration model to accurately predict short-term passenger flows of urban public transport [22].…”
Section: Research On Xgboost Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this algorithm is that it has high accuracy and is not easy to overfit, and it has achieved good results on learning tasks such as multiclassification, prediction and ranking. To obtain high accuracy, the GBDT method needs to traverse all data for each split point of each feature to calculate the information gain, i.e., each iteration needs to traverse all data several times, and the computational complexity will be affected by both the amount of data and the number of features, which makes it difficult for the GBDT method to meet the computational requirements in the face of high-dimensional features and a large amount of data [33].…”
Section: A Light Gradient Boosting Machinementioning
confidence: 99%