2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic downscaling of wind speed over the North Atlantic Ocean using CMIP6 projections: Implications for offshore wind power density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used monthly data for three periods: 1985–2014 for the historical simulation, 2036–2065 for the mid‐term, and 2071–2100 for the long‐term of the 21st century. The RCM output will be called WRF‐CESM2 from now on; for a detailed explanation of the downscaling process, please check Fernández‐Alvarez et al 17 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used monthly data for three periods: 1985–2014 for the historical simulation, 2036–2065 for the mid‐term, and 2071–2100 for the long‐term of the 21st century. The RCM output will be called WRF‐CESM2 from now on; for a detailed explanation of the downscaling process, please check Fernández‐Alvarez et al 17 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used monthly data for three periods: 1985-2014 for the historical simulation, 2036-2065 for the mid-term, and 2071-2100 for the long-term of the 21st century. The RCM output will be called WRF-CESM2 from now on; for a detailed explanation of the downscaling process, please check Fernández-Alvarez et al 17 In addition, the SSP used for the WRF-CESM2 was SSP585, 32,33 as the downscaling has high computational demand. The SSP585 is a scenario (worst-case scenario) that represents emissions high enough to produce a radiative forcing of 8.5 W m −2 in 2100 under extreme conditions.…”
Section: Rcm: Dynamic Downscaling With Wrfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation