2015
DOI: 10.17233/se.09289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Efficiency of Turkish Banks: a DEA Window and Malmquist Index Analysis for the Period of 2003-2012

Abstract: This article utilizes data envelopment analysis (DEA) in order to obtain technical efficiency and allocative efficiency scores of 23 commercial banks which operate in Turkey uninterruptedly between 2003 and 2012. According to results of CCR model analysis 3 banks are not technically efficient in the first years, the number of technically inefficient banks doubles in 2012. On the other hand the number of allocatively inefficient banks is only 5 in the first year and the number declines to 4 in the last year. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the number of DMUs increases the discriminatory power of the method, which is one of the main advantages of this approach in situations where the number of DMUs is small (Halkos and Tzeremes, 2009). According to Kutlar et al (2015), in this analysis, a smaller window size can lead to a smaller number of DMUs, which in combination with a large number of variables reduces the discriminatory power of analysis. But on the other hand, the larger the size of the window, it can cause erroneous results, because important changes that happen at a certain point can be ignored because of the oversized window.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the number of DMUs increases the discriminatory power of the method, which is one of the main advantages of this approach in situations where the number of DMUs is small (Halkos and Tzeremes, 2009). According to Kutlar et al (2015), in this analysis, a smaller window size can lead to a smaller number of DMUs, which in combination with a large number of variables reduces the discriminatory power of analysis. But on the other hand, the larger the size of the window, it can cause erroneous results, because important changes that happen at a certain point can be ignored because of the oversized window.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis assumes that DMUs are a different unit in each period [17]. Substituting the above inputs and outputs of into relevant models will generate the results of DEA window analysis.…”
Section: Dea Window Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study, it was determined that 4 of the 6 ports using the 2006-2012 period data maintained an average efficiency score of 76% or higher. Kutlar et al (2015a) aimed to determine the efficiencies of 31 railway companies throughout the world through DEA-window analysis. For this purpose, the 2000-2009 period data set was analyzed.…”
Section: Almentioning
confidence: 99%