2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic energy system modeling using hybrid physics-based and machine learning encoder–decoder models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The desired metrics are more like composite functions of these directly measurable and well-defined quantities, and obtaining empirically a general form for the relevant equations is often not straightforward and can require significant expert knowledge and experience. Thankfully, a variety of other methods have built on or expanded beyond the original approach to incorporate information on chemical kinetics, [112,115,116] thermochemical/thermophysical information, [115,[117][118][119][120] mass/energy balances, [121][122][123] reactor engineering dynamics, [124,125] computed interatomic potentials, [126] and optics. [127] Many of these expanded approaches enable embedding of chemical information and may no longer be restricted to only finding solutions to and/or fitting PDEs with a previously known form.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The desired metrics are more like composite functions of these directly measurable and well-defined quantities, and obtaining empirically a general form for the relevant equations is often not straightforward and can require significant expert knowledge and experience. Thankfully, a variety of other methods have built on or expanded beyond the original approach to incorporate information on chemical kinetics, [112,115,116] thermochemical/thermophysical information, [115,[117][118][119][120] mass/energy balances, [121][122][123] reactor engineering dynamics, [124,125] computed interatomic potentials, [126] and optics. [127] Many of these expanded approaches enable embedding of chemical information and may no longer be restricted to only finding solutions to and/or fitting PDEs with a previously known form.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thankfully, a variety of other methods have built on or expanded beyond the original approach to incorporate information on chemical kinetics, [ 112 , 115 , 116 ] thermochemical/thermophysical information, [ 115 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ] mass/energy balances, [ 121 , 122 , 123 ] reactor engineering dynamics, [ 124 , 125 ] computed interatomic potentials, [ 126 ] and optics. [ 127 ] Many of these expanded approaches enable embedding of chemical information and may no longer be restricted to only finding solutions to and/or fitting PDEs with a previously known form.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a hybrid ML encoder–decoder architecture is used for dynamic energy prediction at a thermal energy facility in ref. [20]. In the study, different deep learning models anticipate the heat collected by steam and water in a boiler across multiple steps, with a focus on a new hybrid ML model by using an encoder–decoder and based on physics architecture that performs the most accurately overall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While promising, machine learning models for energy forecasting are not devoid of limitations, including complexity, future data dependency, fixed-length input sequences, challenges in handling longterm dependencies, and the specter of overfitting. Researchers have explored alternative machine learning methodologies, exemplified by hybrid encoder-decoder designs that exhibit exceptional accuracy in predicting dynamic energy patterns in thermal power plants [24][25]. In parallel, LSTM Autoencoder models have demonstrated efficacy in forecasting solar plant production a day in advance, adeptly addressing data uncertainties and distortions [26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%