2015
DOI: 10.22260/isarc2015/0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Equipment Workspace Generation for Improving Earthwork Safety Using Equipment Pose and State Data

Abstract: In the period between 1992 and 2002, struck by vehicles and struck by objects (e.g., vehicle parts, vehicle loads, or falling vehicles) were identified as the causes of 30% and 24% of deaths on excavations sites, respectively. It is therefore of a paramount importance to improve the safety of construction sites by increasing the peripheral awareness of the operators of earthwork equipment. The existing collision avoidance systems often detect collisions based on the workspaces that only account for the geometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• improvement of operator protection from overturn, using optimally designed protective structures (Karliński et al, 2008); • machine "pose" estimation to help avoid excavator collisions (Feng et al, 2015); • radio-frequency identification for correct choice and safer use of excavator attachments (Rinneberg et al, 2015); • work environment analysis to design safer plant motion (Lei et al, 2014;Hammad et al, 2015, Vahdatikhaki andHammad 2015a;Zhang et al, 2015); • object tracking to mitigate machine contact incidents Caldas, 2010, 2012;Vahdatikhaki and Hammad, 2015b); • proximity detection for avoidance of "struck-by" incidents (Teizer et al, 2010(Teizer et al, , 2015Teizer, 2015aTeizer, , 2015b; and • electronic remote control for "autonomous" P&M (Yamamoto et al, 2009;Kang et al, 2013;Trung et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• improvement of operator protection from overturn, using optimally designed protective structures (Karliński et al, 2008); • machine "pose" estimation to help avoid excavator collisions (Feng et al, 2015); • radio-frequency identification for correct choice and safer use of excavator attachments (Rinneberg et al, 2015); • work environment analysis to design safer plant motion (Lei et al, 2014;Hammad et al, 2015, Vahdatikhaki andHammad 2015a;Zhang et al, 2015); • object tracking to mitigate machine contact incidents Caldas, 2010, 2012;Vahdatikhaki and Hammad, 2015b); • proximity detection for avoidance of "struck-by" incidents (Teizer et al, 2010(Teizer et al, , 2015Teizer, 2015aTeizer, , 2015b; and • electronic remote control for "autonomous" P&M (Yamamoto et al, 2009;Kang et al, 2013;Trung et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%