2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2020.412802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic exponential model of ferromagnetic hysteresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impedance measurement was done after a minimum of 50 seconds to avoid any transient phase issue. 1 Eddy current pancake coil sensor 2 DC power supply 3 LCR impedance-meter 4 Magnetic excitation yoke 5 Labview® controller 6 Power amplifier 7 Shunt resistor 8 B-coil 9 Frequency generator The tested specimens were all coming from the same batch. They were all electric steel, nonoriented grains (NO) FeSi laminations with a 3 wt % silicon content and referenced 35JNE250.…”
Section: -B) Experimental Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impedance measurement was done after a minimum of 50 seconds to avoid any transient phase issue. 1 Eddy current pancake coil sensor 2 DC power supply 3 LCR impedance-meter 4 Magnetic excitation yoke 5 Labview® controller 6 Power amplifier 7 Shunt resistor 8 B-coil 9 Frequency generator The tested specimens were all coming from the same batch. They were all electric steel, nonoriented grains (NO) FeSi laminations with a 3 wt % silicon content and referenced 35JNE250.…”
Section: -B) Experimental Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic dependence of the magnetization processes is one of them. Even if the first manuscript on this topic has been published in the middle of the 20 th century [1][2], the number of recent (last year) publications is impressive [3]- [11]. A plausible explanation for this surge of interest can be found in the evolution of electromagnetic devices: faster, compacter, and more efficient, forcing the magnetic materials over unprecedented dynamic conditions.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, to achieve the precise sizing and optimal design of the magnetic cores for such applications, magnetic material models should be reproduced accurately minor hysteresis loops in overlap with the major loop or non-symmetrical hysteresis loops, etc. Hysteresis loops of ferromagnetic materials can be predicted using suitable mathematical-phenomenological models (Schneider et al , 2022; Schneider et al , 2023). Among these, in addition to the milestone paper by Stoner and Wohlfarth (1948), should be mentioned Preisach-based models (Mayergoyz, 2003; Cardelli et al , 2010; Ghanim et al , 2019) and those of the play and stop type (Bobbio et al , 1997; Matsuo et al , 2004; Krasnosel’skii and Pokrovskii, 2012; Antonio et al , 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability density function of the hysteresis operator's switching states must be fitted from experimental data, and it is a material characteristic that defines the shape of the major loop and any trajectory inside it (minor loops) [4]. The combination of Jiles-Atherton (J-A) and Preisach models with the theory of Néel's fluctuating field introduced an exponential model [5], which was able to accurately predict even more intricate magnetic behaviors, but is rather complex. The Harrison model was also implemented for specific material types [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%