2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(03)00047-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic force microscopy imaging of native membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Topography images were acquired using magnetic ACmode (MACmode) AFM, where an alternating magnetic field drives the oscillation of a magnetically coated cantilever 22,23 (Figure 1(a)-(c)). sendai-PM were 5(G1) nm in height and exhibited a hexagonal arrangement of trimeric bacteriorhodopsin (BR) molecules, similar to the appearance of wild-type PM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Topography images were acquired using magnetic ACmode (MACmode) AFM, where an alternating magnetic field drives the oscillation of a magnetically coated cantilever 22,23 (Figure 1(a)-(c)). sendai-PM were 5(G1) nm in height and exhibited a hexagonal arrangement of trimeric bacteriorhodopsin (BR) molecules, similar to the appearance of wild-type PM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the overall displacement during imaging, immobilization procedures for tight and non-invasive anchoring of cells to substrates have been developed (Schilcher et al, 1997). In addition, dynamic force microscopy (DFM) methods like tappingmode (Putman et al, 1994) and MACmode AFM (Han et al, 1996) have greatly reduced the problem of lateral forces responsible for tip-induced deformation of soft biological samples (Kienberger et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the advantage of DFM is that lateral friction forces during imaging are significantly reduced, thereby minimizing sample damage by the scanning cantilever (Kienberger et al, 2004). Imaging of biological specimens has therefore significantly benefited from the development of DFM, since soft samples are less deformed and specimens weakly adhered to surfaces are not so easily displaced by the scanning cantilever (Kienberger et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, contact-mode imaging turned out to be less suitable for weakly attached samples, because biomolecules are often pushed away by the AFM stylus during scanning (12). To overcome this disadvantage, dynamic force microscopy (DFM) methods such as tapping-mode AFM, and more recently, magnetic AC mode AFM (MACmode AFM) (5) have been used for imaging soft and weakly attached biological samples (14,17). For DFM, the cantilever oscillates and touches the sample only intermittently at the end of its downward movement, which reduces the contact time and minimizes friction forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%