2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7687802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests

Abstract: The fracturing behavior of layered rocks is usually influenced by bedding planes. In this paper, five groups of bedded sandstones with different bedding inclination angles are used to carry out impact compression tests by split Hopkinson pressure bar. A highspeed camera is used to capture the fracturing process of specimens. Based on testing results, three failure patterns are identified and classified, including (A) splitting along bedding planes; (B) sliding failure along bedding planes; (C) fracturing acros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PFC2D framework was selected to simulate our SHPB impact experiment as it provides both a scientific tool to investigate the micromechanisms that combine to produce complex macroscopic behaviors and an engineering tool to predict these macroscopic behaviors [ 48 ]. PFC2D can be used to simulate many scientific problems in rock mechanics and rock engineering [ 49 ], and it is also widely used in SHPB dynamic testing [ 23 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Micro Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PFC2D framework was selected to simulate our SHPB impact experiment as it provides both a scientific tool to investigate the micromechanisms that combine to produce complex macroscopic behaviors and an engineering tool to predict these macroscopic behaviors [ 48 ]. PFC2D can be used to simulate many scientific problems in rock mechanics and rock engineering [ 49 ], and it is also widely used in SHPB dynamic testing [ 23 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Micro Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework includes two basic bonding models: parallel bond model (PBM) and contact bond model (CBM). The PBM provides the force-displacement behavior of a finite-sized piece of cementitious material deposited between two pieces, acting in parallel with a linear model [ 53 ]. The particle can freely move in the shear and normal direction and rotate between particles.…”
Section: Micro Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [17][18][19][20][21][22] analyzed shales under complex geological conditions; simulation software pEDFM was used to construct analytical models for controlling the connection and optimization between volumes. Zhang et al [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] carried out SHPB tests on sandstone under different impact conditions and obtained stress-strain curves and rock fragmentation, and the peak strain, particle size distribution, and energy dissipation of sandstone were further analyzed. Metamorphic limestone is one of the main lithologies in the Dahongshan mining area in Yuxi city, Yunnan province; the existing static parameters cannot meet the needs of mine production and scientific research modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through theoretical analysis [7][8][9], similarity simulation [10,11], numerical simulation [12][13][14][15], and acoustic emission testing [16][17][18][19], a large number of scholars have systematically studied layered composite rock masses from the perspective of macro-deformation Symmetry 2021, 13, 1132 2 of 18 and micro-damage. A layered rock mass is generally regarded as a transversely isotropic rock mass, and the most influential criterion is the Jaeger failure criterion based on the relationship between the interlayer shear force and bedding dip angle [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%