2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-013-0318-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Hedging of Portfolio Credit Risk in a Markov Copula Model

Abstract: We consider a bottom-up Markovian copula model of portfolio credit risk where dependence among credit names mainly stems from the possibility of simultaneous defaults. Due to the Markovian copula nature of the model, calibration of marginals and dependence parameters can be performed separately using a two-steps procedure, much like in a standard static copula set-up. In addition, the model admits a common shocks interpretation, which is a very important feature as, thanks to it, efficient convolution recursio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect of the Markov copula theory is of fundamental importance for efficient calibration of a model to market data. In [4] and [2] (see also references therein), the strong Markov copula theory was successfully applied to separate calibration of dependence in the pool of 125 obligors (constituting an iTraxx index), from the calibration of univariate characteristics of the individual obligors. We are currently working on using the weak-only Markov copulae for such purpose.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect of the Markov copula theory is of fundamental importance for efficient calibration of a model to market data. In [4] and [2] (see also references therein), the strong Markov copula theory was successfully applied to separate calibration of dependence in the pool of 125 obligors (constituting an iTraxx index), from the calibration of univariate characteristics of the individual obligors. We are currently working on using the weak-only Markov copulae for such purpose.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that many existing models of default contagion are variants of the above described framework. Without being exhaustive, we mention some variants: non absorbing states (Giesecke and Weber [21], [22]); credit migration models with more than two states for each debtor (Davis and Esparragoza-Rodriguez [10], Bielecki et al [4]); the so-called frailty models where the filtration F is (partially) unavailable for pricing and filtering techniques are used (Frey and Schmidt [20]); more than one default is allowed to occur at a time (Bielecki, Cousin, Crépey, Herbertsson [2]). We recommend the survey paper by Bielecki, Crépey, Herbertsson [24] for a more detailed analysis of the Markovian setting.…”
Section: Default Models With Interacting Intensities: the Markovian Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following proposition, we compute the conditional survival probability of ( ) ∈ defined by, for every positive , , Recalling (5), let , , = , , ( , , ).…”
Section: Conditional Survival Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%