2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-388448-0.00024-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Imaging of Homo-FRET in Live Cells by Fluorescence Anisotropy Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity measurements based on fl uorescence (or Förster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) [reviewed in (67)(68)(69)] and, more recently, super-resolution imaging ( 71,72 ) have been utilized to explore the nanoscale organization of the GPI-anchored proteins at the cell surface.…”
Section: Diffusional Dynamics Of Gpi-anchored Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proximity measurements based on fl uorescence (or Förster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) [reviewed in (67)(68)(69)] and, more recently, super-resolution imaging ( 71,72 ) have been utilized to explore the nanoscale organization of the GPI-anchored proteins at the cell surface.…”
Section: Diffusional Dynamics Of Gpi-anchored Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the implementation of homo-FRET measurement on several microscopy modalities/platforms allowed studying GPI-anchored protein clustering at superior spatiotemporal resolution ( 68,83 ). Homo-FRET imaging at a higher spatial resolution ( ‫ف‬ 300 nm) showed that GPIanchored protein nanoclusters exhibit spatially nonrandom distributions ( Fig.…”
Section: Gpi-anchored Protein Nanoclustering Requires Transbilayer Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation and emission dipoles of GFP are highly aligned to one another and may be referred to collectively as the transition dipole 28,29 . Furthermore, the difference in time between excitation and emission is short relative to tumbling time for GFP 27 (and integrin-GFP fusions). The high NA objectives used in TIRF somewhat lower the absolute values of anisotropy 27 ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). For GFP in solution, these effects result in a drop of the observed anisotropy from the typical value of 0.32 50 to~0.18-0.20 27,51 . As these depolarization effects are similar across the various experimental systems used in this article, the relative changes in anisotropy and not the absolute values of anisotropy are significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation