2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic impact for ant colony optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All three dynamic optimization strategies are implemented within the same baseline ACO core algorithm, solving static MKP benchmarks [58]. High-quality MKP solutions were possible to achieve by utilizing a dynamic impact evaluation method in the ACO edge's probability calculation.…”
Section: Baseline Aco Algorithm and Optimization Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All three dynamic optimization strategies are implemented within the same baseline ACO core algorithm, solving static MKP benchmarks [58]. High-quality MKP solutions were possible to achieve by utilizing a dynamic impact evaluation method in the ACO edge's probability calculation.…”
Section: Baseline Aco Algorithm and Optimization Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACO algorithm parameters have been tuned in previous research [58] and used throughout all experimentation. The best combination of pheromone parameters are: 𝜏 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ = 1, 𝜏 π‘šπ‘–π‘› = 0.001, 𝜏 0 = 1, βˆ†πœ 0 = 1, 𝜌 = 0.1.…”
Section: Baseline Aco Algorithm and Optimization Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ο„ i,j shows the number of edge pheromones i, j, and Ξ± defines the effect of the pheromone, Ξ· i,j specifies the edge desirability. i, j, and Ξ² define influence of desirability [35].…”
Section: Creation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, comparison was performed on simple WEISH instances, where most algorithms in the literature can achieve optimum solution, therefore performance is measured in terms of the success rate (how many times algorithm was able to achieve optimum) or in terms of the average error percentage error (2) across all instances. For the comparison, the six best performing algorithms were selected from the literature, which include Ant Colony Optimization with Dynamic impact (ACOwD) described in [11], Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm (IWOA) [22], two variations of binary differential search TE-BDS and TR-BDS proposed in [43], and two implementations of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) with self-adaptive check and repair -SACRO-CBPSOTVAC and SACRO-BPSOTVAC [19]. Results in Fig.…”
Section: Comparisons To the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive literature review of solving MKPs was provided by [8] and a more recent MKP overview by [9] summarizes algorithms used for solving MKP. This paper focuses on the state-of-the-art population and metaheuristic algorithms used for solving MKP instances, such as ant colony optimization ( [10], [11]), various types of genetic algorithms ( [12], [13], [14]), evolutionary algorithms ( [15], [16], [17]), variations of particle swarm optimization algorithm ( [18], [19]), binary harmony search [20], binary cuckoo search algorithm [21], whale optimization algorithm [22] and etc. Most of the research in population-based algorithms focuses on small MKP instances with 𝑛 ≀ 100, while only few explore large instances with 𝑛 = 500 and above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%