2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic in-situ imaging of methane hydrate formation and self-preservation in porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result confirmed that the secondary hydrate formation would change the sediment fabric. Significant movement and roatation of sand particles were also observed in previous CT study on hydrate‐bearing sands during formation (Lei, Liu, et al, 2019; Nikitin et al, 2020). In addition, the sediment matrix size and the excess gas/water condition could influence this effect to some extent (Lee et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result confirmed that the secondary hydrate formation would change the sediment fabric. Significant movement and roatation of sand particles were also observed in previous CT study on hydrate‐bearing sands during formation (Lei, Liu, et al, 2019; Nikitin et al, 2020). In addition, the sediment matrix size and the excess gas/water condition could influence this effect to some extent (Lee et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Additionally, XeH requires a much lower equilibrium pressure compared to NGH and thus makes the CT experiment which is conducted in a limited space safer (Chaouachi et al, 2015). In the past decades, NGH has been widely substituted with XeH in studying the microstructural evolution of gas hydrates in sedimentary matrices during hydrate formation and dissociation because of the same morphology between XeH and NGH (Chaouachi et al, 2015; Nikitin et al, 2020; Yang et al, 2016). The experiments were carried out following the procedures mentioned below, which are similar to those used in Hyodo et al (2014): Specimen preparation: First, the water (1.6 g) was well mixed with the dried Fujian sand (18.2 g) to achieve the targeted saturation and density, and the initial water saturation was 28.8%.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For model A, it was found that hydrate first generated at the menisci between sand particles, and this occurrence, so‐called the “cementing” type, has been widely found in many visual experiments (Lei & Seol, 2018; Nikitin et al, 2020) and can greatly enhance the strength and modulus of the sediment (Hyodo et al, 2013). The hydrate then began to encapsulate the sand particle surface, and it connected multiple sand particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that these CT images were taken over 5 hr after the loading, and this extended scan time allows for hydrate redistribution that could heal hydrate cracks that may initially exist in freshly loaded hydrate. Faster CT scans with brilliant synchrotron sources (Nikitin et al, 2020) immediately after the loading or even during the loading may be required to capture such cracks in hydrate. In fact, hydrate enduring large deformation in Figures 2e′ and 3d′ is porous, which indicates historical development of cracks.…”
Section: Cracks In Hydratementioning
confidence: 99%