2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrf.20044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic (in)stability of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica

Abstract: [1] Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica, has the potential to directly contribute 1 m to sea level and currently is losing mass and thinning rapidly. Here, we report on regional results for the Sea-level Response to Ice Sheet Evolution (SeaRISE) experiments and investigate the impact of i) spatial resolution within existing data sets, ii) grounding-zone processes, and iii) till rheology on the dynamics of this outlet glacier. In addition to the SeaRISE data sets, we use detailed aerogeophysical and satellite dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
168
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
13
168
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some localized patches of faster surface lowering might have been related to drainage of subglacial lakes as observed by Smith et al [2016] at higher resolution. In contrast to PIG and the PSK glaciers, THG is not constrained by a relatively narrow bedrock trough, has a greater lateral extent, and the less confined floating glacier tongue and ice shelf provide less buttressing to the grounded ice, making THG less susceptible to an increase in subshelf melting [Parizek et al, 2013;Nias et al, 2016]. Consequently, if the episodic surface lowering was of ice-dynamical origin, it could have been due to temporally well-defined events of ungrounding and a relatively abrupt response of the fast-flowing sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some localized patches of faster surface lowering might have been related to drainage of subglacial lakes as observed by Smith et al [2016] at higher resolution. In contrast to PIG and the PSK glaciers, THG is not constrained by a relatively narrow bedrock trough, has a greater lateral extent, and the less confined floating glacier tongue and ice shelf provide less buttressing to the grounded ice, making THG less susceptible to an increase in subshelf melting [Parizek et al, 2013;Nias et al, 2016]. Consequently, if the episodic surface lowering was of ice-dynamical origin, it could have been due to temporally well-defined events of ungrounding and a relatively abrupt response of the fast-flowing sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Modeled retreat rates can be sensitive to how melting is applied at the grounding line [Parizek et al, 2013;Golledge et al, 2015]. We implemented a subgrid melting parametrization and performed two sets of simulations, either applying melt to partially grounded cells in proportion to their floating area fraction or restricting all submarine melting to fully floating cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically, some interaction between melting and basal drag may be expected [Parizek et al, 2013]. Retreat rates may prove to be sensitive to whether oceanic melting can thin the ice upstream of discrete pinning points that support basal drag, allowing them to go afloat.…”
Section: Figure 3 (Top Left) Shows Bayesian Probabilities P(s > Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the potentially rough and shoaling topography upstream of the 2008 GL may require prolonged, continuously high, or increased rates of thinning to permit GL retreat -a process that has been modelled across both idealized and physically constrained grounding zone geometries over other parts of West Antarctica (cf. Schoof et al, 2007;Durand et al, 2011;Parizek et al, 2013;Nias et al, 2016). Until more comprehensive knowledge of Getz Ice Shelf's grounding zone bed structure exists, glacier/ice-stream-specific internal variability, moderated by bed conditions at the 2010-2015 grounding zone, cannot be reliably dismissed as an additional control on the slowdown of GL retreat rate during the CryoSat-2 era.…”
Section: Grounding Zone Bed Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%