2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic in-vivo assessment of navicular drop while running in barefoot, minimalist, and motion control footwear conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 48 , 49 ] A previous study showed that at the stance phase of running, a high ND could be associated with increased peak ankle and knee joint moments, which in turn may lead to lower extremity injuries. [ 50 ] Moreover, as static measures of ND have poor association with dynamic measures [ 51 ] because only sagittal plane movement is taken into account, [ 52 ] dynamic navicular assessment may be an effective tool to examine foot function affected by extrinsic and intrinsic factors in walking and running. [ 53 ] Therefore, in this study, ND was measured during weight bearing, walking, and jogging; nevertheless, a significant difference among the taping conditions was not found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 48 , 49 ] A previous study showed that at the stance phase of running, a high ND could be associated with increased peak ankle and knee joint moments, which in turn may lead to lower extremity injuries. [ 50 ] Moreover, as static measures of ND have poor association with dynamic measures [ 51 ] because only sagittal plane movement is taken into account, [ 52 ] dynamic navicular assessment may be an effective tool to examine foot function affected by extrinsic and intrinsic factors in walking and running. [ 53 ] Therefore, in this study, ND was measured during weight bearing, walking, and jogging; nevertheless, a significant difference among the taping conditions was not found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic studies using biplane fluoroscopy have been used to determine the effects of footwear on the motion of the tibiotalar and STJs 13 as well as the navicular drop and navicular drop rate in minimalist, stability and motion control shoes. 14 Markerless RSA has been previously used to quantify the angle of the MLA for barefoot and shod conditions 15 ; however, there is no current literature discussing the effects of foot orthoses on foot kinematics using this method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional study on healthy adults investigated the relationship between cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation and selected multi-segment foot kinematics from the Oxford Foot Model during the stance phase of barefoot walking at a self-selected pace. This study aimed to validate the concept of using a minimal markerset to measure cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation, two surrogate parameters which seem promising to assess foot function during dynamic tasks [12, 13]. To draw the key conclusions from the data presented in this article it is important to note that the FFtoHF pronation from the OFM actually describes the frontal plane motion of the FF with respect to the HF and does not correspond with the clinical understanding of pronation, which is the triplanar combination of FF to HF dorsiflexion—abduction—eversion [3, 5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A marker at the navicular bone provides valuable information for midfoot kinematics [11]. Assessment of the navicular mobility in terms of cranio-caudal (NCC) and medio-lateral (NML) translation of the navicular tuberosity originates from the domain of clinical evaluation of the foot and is thought to be representative for foot pronation [12, 13]. The concept goes back to the ideas of navicular drop and drift, the vertical or medial excursion of the navicular tuberosity when going from a subtalar neutral position into a relaxed calcaneal position, which were proposed as quasi-static estimates for the amount of foot pronation and to provide further insights into talonavicular joint mechanics [14–16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%