2015
DOI: 10.1680/geot.13.p.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic installation and monotonic pullout of a torpedo anchor in calcareous silt

Abstract: Challenges associated with dynamically installed anchors include prediction of the anchor embedment depth, which dictates the anchor's holding capacity. This is particularly true for calcareous sediments, as very little performance data exist for this anchor type in these soils. This paper reports results from a series of model tests undertaken to provide insight into the behaviour of a torpedo anchor during dynamic installation and monotonic pullout in lightly overconsolidated calcareous silt. The tests were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ). This concept is consistent with the method proposed by Nottingham (1975) and Schmertmann (1978) for assessing pile capacity in clay, and recently adopted for back calculating torpedo anchor vertical pullout capacity in calcareous silt (Hossain et al, 2015).…”
Section: Piezocone Based Direct Design Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ). This concept is consistent with the method proposed by Nottingham (1975) and Schmertmann (1978) for assessing pile capacity in clay, and recently adopted for back calculating torpedo anchor vertical pullout capacity in calcareous silt (Hossain et al, 2015).…”
Section: Piezocone Based Direct Design Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For this axisymmetric problem,  = 1/2 of plane strain value of ~0.08 (as was obtained for installation) = 0.04 was used (following Low et al, 2008). The strength mobilised during caisson pullout will be different to that mobilised during caisson installation due to significant inward flow that causes significant effective stress changes in the soil surrounding the caisson, strength regain following reconsolidation (Chen & Randolph, 2007;Hossain et al, 2015). These effects were captured by back-figuring o from the measured holding capacity and Equation 8 using the measured (intact) shear strength profile, su,p = 1.5 + 1.…”
Section: Shear Resistance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies (Medeiros, 2002;de Araujo et al, 2004;Brandão et al, 2006;Richardson et al, 2009;O'Loughlin et al, 2009O'Loughlin et al, , 2013Chow et al, 2014;Hossain et al, 2014Hossain et al, , 2015Kim et al, 2015) have adopted such an approach, with variations on the inclusion and formulation of the various forces acting on a torpedo anchor. A similar approach is adopted here…”
Section: Extended Bearing Resistance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive background information to installation of torpedo anchors can be found in Hossain et al (2014Hossain et al ( , 2015 and Kim et al (2015), which are not repeated here. For convenience, Figs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been used for temporary facilities in the Gulf of Mexico (Zimmerman et al 2009), although the design used in the Gulf of Mexico is quite different to that used offshore Brazil. The majority of performance data are from centrifuge studies (O'Loughlin et al 2004Richardson et al 2006Richardson et al , 2009Gaudin et al 2013;Hossain et al 2015) although a growing body of field experience is becoming available (Zimmerman et al 2009, O'Beirne et al 2015.…”
Section: Performance Data and Technology Maturity Of Each Anchor Typementioning
confidence: 99%