2008
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m800896200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Interaction of the Measles Virus Hemagglutinin with Its Receptor Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule (SLAM, CD150)

Abstract: The interaction of measles virus with its receptor signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) controls cell entry and governs tropism. We predicted potential interface areas of the measles virus attachment protein hemagglutinin to begin the investigation. We then assessed the relevance of individual amino acids located in these areas for SLAM-binding and SLAM-dependent membrane fusion, as measured by surface plasmon resonance and receptor-specific fusion assays, respectively. These studies identified one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
76
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To further show that cell entry of the MV WT -HIV particles was SLAM-independent, we generated vector particles with the 194A mutant of the H WT protein, which interferes with SLAM binding. 22 These particles transduced small airway epithelial cells with high efficiency (11% GFP + cells) but were unable to transduce Raji cells (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further show that cell entry of the MV WT -HIV particles was SLAM-independent, we generated vector particles with the 194A mutant of the H WT protein, which interferes with SLAM binding. 22 These particles transduced small airway epithelial cells with high efficiency (11% GFP + cells) but were unable to transduce Raji cells (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As the H residues contacting SLAM are different from those contacting EpR, 7,22 EpR-specific vectors that are SLAMblind can be generated. As the EpR is expressed basolaterally, gene transfer to lung and other epithelia upon systemic application may become feasible with this vector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2C exemplifies that, following binding of this sSLAM-IgG construct to H-expressing cells by flow cytometry, the ratios of SLAM-specific mean fluorescence intensity to H-specific mean fluorescence intensity provide an assessment of receptor (SLAM) binding competence. For a control, an I194S mutant (H-I194S) that reportedly is unable to bind to SLAM was assessed (48). This construct returned a SLAM-to-H signal ratio of 0.03, compared to 1.07 obtained for standard H (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If H stalks enjoy some rotational flexibility and residues in stalk section 84 to 118 (presumably residues 111, 114, and 118) engage in short-range contacts for F triggering, how is receptor binding by the H head domain (48,71) signaled to the contact zone despite the presence of a long (41-residue) stalk insertion? Interestingly, no major conformational changes between crystal structures of PIV5 HN, HPIV3 HN, and henipavirus G, solved alone or in complex with their receptors, were observed (8,9,74).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3 EpR-relevant residues (red) define a small triangle located slightly above the equator. I194, the residue governing SLAM-binding (27), and the 4 residues involved in SLAM-dependent conformational changes (purple) (16) are located centrally on the top of each dimer. Most CD46-relevant residues (yellow) are in the bottom half.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%