2017
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic interplay between merger process justice and cognitive trust in top management: A longitudinal study.

Abstract: This study examines two fundamental concerns in the context of organizational change: employees' perceptions of merger process justice and cognitive trust in the top management team. Our main purpose is to better understand the nature of reciprocal relations between these important constructs through a significant change event. Previous research, building mainly on social exchange theory, has framed trust as a consequence of justice perceptions. More recently, scholars have suggested that this view may be over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Battilana, 2011), government bodies in the UK and Finland (e.g. Kaltiainen et al, 2017), and Canadian National Sport Organizations (e.g. Amis et al, 2004; Hinings et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Battilana, 2011), government bodies in the UK and Finland (e.g. Kaltiainen et al, 2017), and Canadian National Sport Organizations (e.g. Amis et al, 2004; Hinings et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we acknowledge that there are many differences between public and private sector organizations, not least because of the often greater levels of bureaucracy and job security in public sector organizations, tremendous insight on change has been developed through studies in public sector organizations from around the world. These have included the National Health Service in Britain (e.g., Battilana, 2011), government bodies in the UK and Finland (e.g., Kaltiainen, Lipponen & Holtz, 2017), and Canadian National Sport Organizations (e.g., Amis et al, 2004;Hinings, Thibault, Slack & Kikulis, 1996). There has also been a great deal of ground breaking work in schools (e.g., Currie, Lockett & Suhomlinova, 2009;Amis, Wright, Dyson, Vardaman, & Ferry, 2012) which has also been transferrable to other settings.…”
Section: Scope Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, and the most unique contribution of the current research is into providing the understanding of the justice framework during M&A situations. The aim of the earlier justice research has largely remained fragmented, where justice and its inter-relationships with organizational practices and with second-order psychological attitudes (Bansal, 2017a;Ellis et al, 2009;Kaltiainen et al, 2017) have been discussed in pieces in the management research. Unfortunately, there has been a clear dearth of research, which explains its overall functioning, from formation to impact, during M&A situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral withdrawal is a matter of degree, with voluntary turnover representing its most extreme manifestation and absenteeism can be less dramatic one, and both serving the same purpose of mitigating any perceived threats (e.g., Sagie, Birati, & Tziner, 2002). For instance, building on social exchange theory, Kaltiainen, Lipponen, and Holtz (2017) examined M&As as sources of major organizational change and found that cognitive trust has a positive impact on subsequent employee perceptions of merger process justice. The afore‐mentioned finding is supported by protection motivation research, which shows that perceived threats predict intentions to withdraw from situations and to avoid the sources of such threats (e.g., Eppright, Hunt, Tanner Jr, & Franke, 2002).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%