Ieee Infocom 2004 2004
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic join-exit amortization and scheduling for time-efficient group key agreement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we compare the rekeying cost in PACK upon single user join and leave events with two existing tree-based contributory group key agreement schemes: TGDH [7] and DST [8]. All three types of cost are considered: time, computation, and communication.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Next we compare the rekeying cost in PACK upon single user join and leave events with two existing tree-based contributory group key agreement schemes: TGDH [7] and DST [8]. All three types of cost are considered: time, computation, and communication.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributory group key agreement is a promising solution to achieve access control in collaborative and dynamic group applications [1]- [8]. However, the early design of contributory group key agreement schemes mostly considers the efficiency of initial group key establishment [1]- [3], which encounter high rekeying cost upon group membership changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the literature, many group key management protocols have been proposed [6], [7], [9]- [13], [15]- [24]. The early designs of contributory key agreements mostly consider the efficiency of key establishment [25] [26] [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%