2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-019-01064-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Leader Allocation in Multi-robot Systems Based on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will be indispensable for further research especially in view of engineering background and intelligence paradigm of swarm robotics. 8,[11][12][13] FUNDING This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51875331 and 11672169).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will be indispensable for further research especially in view of engineering background and intelligence paradigm of swarm robotics. 8,[11][12][13] FUNDING This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51875331 and 11672169).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Recently, some researchers devoted themselves to developing different kinds of consensus or synchronization tracking control approaches for MNWMRs from various perspectives, including neural network optimization (NNO), nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC), and Takagi-Sugeno type fuzzy automaton (TS-TFA). [11][12][13] Generally speaking, on the one hand, the tracking control or stabilization of NWMR is a challenging research issue. This is mainly because a single wheeled mobile robot in a plane under the nonholonomic constraints has three degree-of-freedoms (DOFs), yet it is controlled using two control inputs only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods have limited effectiveness in accurately tracking the target formation [18], which restricts configuration changes to variations in time, scales, and orientation of the target configuration [19][20][21]. From a control perspective, the dynamic change of configuration can be specified at the global formation level [19][20][21][22] or the local level [23,24]. The global approach involves presetting the path points of the formation's center of gravity for agents to follow, maintaining the rigid body structure by preserving relative positions and transitioning between different formation shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%