1997
DOI: 10.1364/ao.36.007508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic light scattering with single-mode receivers: partial heterodyning regime

Abstract: A frequent source of errors in dynamic light-scattering experiments is partial heterodyning caused by scattering on large particles or imperfections of the sample cell. With a conventional two-pinhole receiver it is impossible to distinguish its effect from the effects of a finite detector area and detector nonlinearity. However, an accurate data analysis is feasible when a single-mode light receiver is employed. We present formulas for single-mode autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions that include a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure compensates for nonidealities of the detectors (dead-time and dark counts [31]) and of the fiber receivers (see Subsection 2.B). A LABVIEW script is used to control the correlator and average the correlation functions.…”
Section: A Multispeckle Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure compensates for nonidealities of the detectors (dead-time and dark counts [31]) and of the fiber receivers (see Subsection 2.B). A LABVIEW script is used to control the correlator and average the correlation functions.…”
Section: A Multispeckle Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before fixing the source and detector, the hair was combed away so that the illuminator and detector had good optical contact to the scalp. During both the resting baseline and the task periods, each lasting 100 s, we recorded ten normalized intensity autocorrelation functions, each with a duration of 10 s. To make sure that the amplitude of the measured intensity autocorrelation function was due to the few-mode receiver optics only ͑and not due to contributions of static scattering to the signal 42 ͒, we measured g ͑2͒ ͑r , ͒, using the same setup, from a turbid latex sample immediately before and after the measurements on the subjects.…”
Section: Diffusing-wave Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decay time of the translational correlation function F t (q, t) = exp[−q 2 D t t] (where q is the magnitude of the scattering vector and D t = k B T /(6πηR) is the translational diffusion coefficient) is independent of the magnetic field strength B 0 , indicating that rotation and translation are indeed decoupled. Correcting g (2) VH (t) for static scattering [12] and Faraday rotation of VV scattered light by the cell walls yields the rotational correlation function g (1) VH (t)/F t (q, t) which is, in this specific geometry, given by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%