2020
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic linkage of COVID-19 test results between Public Health England’s Second Generation Surveillance System and UK Biobank

Abstract: UK Biobank (UKB) is an international health resource enabling research into the genetic and lifestyle determinants of common diseases of middle and older age. It comprises 500 000 participants. Public Health England’s Second Generation Surveillance System is a centralized microbiology database covering English clinical diagnostics laboratories that provides national surveillance of legally notifiable infections, bacterial isolations and antimicrobial resistance. We previously developed secure, pseudonymized, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
172
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In April 2020, General Practices across the UK released primary care data on COVID-19 testing for linkage to the participants in the UK Biobank project 101,102 and results from analyses are already appearing 103 . Of the 486,967 participants, 1410 currently have data on COVID-19 testing.…”
Section: Box 3 | Factors Influencing Being Tested In Uk Biobankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In April 2020, General Practices across the UK released primary care data on COVID-19 testing for linkage to the participants in the UK Biobank project 101,102 and results from analyses are already appearing 103 . Of the 486,967 participants, 1410 currently have data on COVID-19 testing.…”
Section: Box 3 | Factors Influencing Being Tested In Uk Biobankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Fewer transfers from long-term care facilities may lead to fewer cycles between long-term care facilities and hospitals [5] • Construction of new COVID-19 facilities without an established reservoir of MDROs [5] unlikely to be immediate, and that the necessary delays to observe these effects-as well as the thresholds above which changes in antibiotic prescribing and IPC result in an effect-will need to be taken into account when analysing data [28]. We should learn from the COVID-19 pandemic, with its rapid turnover and use of whole genome sequencing data, and dynamic linkage of various health databases [8,29]. Surveillance data based on clinical samples in particular, if focused only on bloodstream infections, may provide a distorted picture of the effect of COVID-19 on AMR since the effect may only manifest itself in other clinical sites or even only in the commensal flora.…”
Section: Type Of Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COVID-19 diagnoses were sourced via available COVID-19 test results within the UK Biobank dataset at the time of manuscript preparation (from 16th March 2020 to 1st June 2020), sourced from Public Health England [21]. The vast majority of these COVID-19 tests were via a combined nasal and throat swab.…”
Section: Covid-19 Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%