2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2020.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Łukasiewicz Logic and Dynamic MV-algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the axiom Ax0 is well known as axiom of basic modal logic K , the axioms Ax1-Ax6 have been proposed by Segerberg in 1977 (see also Kozen and Parikh 1981) for dynamic logic, but in a terms, and Ax7-Ax8 are specific axioms for modal Łukasiewicz logic (Di Nola and Grigolia 2004;Hansoul and Teheux 2006). Notice also the works (Di Nola et al 2020;Teheux 2014) on dynamic Łukasiewicz logic.…”
Section: Immune Dynamic łUkasiewicz Logic Idł Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notice that the axiom Ax0 is well known as axiom of basic modal logic K , the axioms Ax1-Ax6 have been proposed by Segerberg in 1977 (see also Kozen and Parikh 1981) for dynamic logic, but in a terms, and Ax7-Ax8 are specific axioms for modal Łukasiewicz logic (Di Nola and Grigolia 2004;Hansoul and Teheux 2006). Notice also the works (Di Nola et al 2020;Teheux 2014) on dynamic Łukasiewicz logic.…”
Section: Immune Dynamic łUkasiewicz Logic Idł Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to dynamic propositional Łukasiewicz logic introduced in Di Nola et al (2020), we introduce immune dynamic n-valued Łukasiewicz logic I DL n , the main difference of which are in interpretations. Immune dynamic n-valued Łukasiewicz logic I DŁ n is designed for representing and reasoning about propositional Łukasiewicz logic expected 1 M V n -algebras where introduced by Grigolia in Grigolia (1977).…”
Section: Immune Dynamic łUkasiewicz Logic Idł Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the semantics of IDL n are Kripke semantics [18] that is similar to the ones that have been done in [22]. In the presented case the formula [a ∪ b]φ means that whenever laboratory experiment a or b is successfully done, a state is reached where φ holds, whereas the formula ⟨(a; b)⟩φ means that there is a sequence of consecutive laboratory experiments a and b such that a state is reached where φ holds.…”
Section: Dynamic Lukasiewicz Logic and Its Application To Immune Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following K. Segerberg [41] (1977), D. Kozen [31] (1979) and V. Pratt [38] (1980), who have been introduced dynamic (classical) propositional logic, that is a formal system for reasoning about programs, and dynamic algebras, dynamic propositional Lukasiewicz logic DP L (dynamic n-valued propositional Lukasiewicz logic DP L n ) and dynamic M V -algebras (dynamic M V n -algebras) are introduced and theories of the logic DP L (DP L n ) and dynamic M V -algebras (M V n -algebras) are developed [22] (2020). Dynamic M V -algebras (dynamic M V n -algebras) are algebraic counterparts of the logic DP L (DP L n ), that in turn represent two-sorted algebras that combine the varieties of M V -algebras (M V n -algebras) and regular algebras into a single finitely axiomatized variety resembling R-module with scalar multiplication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%