2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of minimally invasive pelvic floor reconstruction with polypropylene implant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…women with primary as well as recurrent pelvic organ prolapse were included and the follow‐up rate in this study was only 64%, which may have caused a significant bias. In a recent study with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging a much higher rate of de novo prolapse of 73% (11 of 15) was observed in the untreated compartments 3 months following pelvic organ prolapse repair with polypropylene mesh 12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…women with primary as well as recurrent pelvic organ prolapse were included and the follow‐up rate in this study was only 64%, which may have caused a significant bias. In a recent study with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging a much higher rate of de novo prolapse of 73% (11 of 15) was observed in the untreated compartments 3 months following pelvic organ prolapse repair with polypropylene mesh 12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In their study to assess the role of elastography using ARFI in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions, Tozaki, et al [19] found that the negative predictive value was 100%, as seen for VTQ in our study (Table 3). In another study, Tozaki, et al [20] deduced that the mean shear wave velocity was significantly higher in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (4.49 m/s vs. 2.68 m/s). It was not possible to measure shear wave velocity in 23.5% of the malignant lesions, as seen in our study also.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p group Student's t test for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and robotassisted ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR). p time Student's t test for pre-to postoperative change for all patients Anatomical restoration has been evaluated by POP-Q and dynamic MRI after both anterior and posterior vaginal polypropylene meshes and recently also after sacral colpopexy [20,[22][23][24][25]. Siegmann et al reported in their series of 15 patients (9 anterior, 6 posterior meshes) 3 months after surgery up to 80 % of patients presenting newly developed or increased prolapse, mostly in the untreated pelvic floor compartment, although this did not correspond to symptoms [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%