1994
DOI: 10.1080/01418619408242933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic mechanical response and thermal expansion of ceramic particle reinforced aluminium 6061 matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stephens and co-workers [13] also report a weak interface due to reaction in a B 4 C reinforced Al Á/7Si alloy produced by stir-casting; the interface was found to be responsible for the poor mechanical performance of those composites. Vaidya et al [14] on the other hand, provide evidence that in spray-cast 15 vol.% B 4 C reinforced 6061 aluminum alloy, the reinforcement significantly enhances the mechanical properties of the matrix both in quasi-static and dynamic testing. The composites are found to be reaction-free and the interface is reported to be very strong due to good wetting of the B 4 C particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stephens and co-workers [13] also report a weak interface due to reaction in a B 4 C reinforced Al Á/7Si alloy produced by stir-casting; the interface was found to be responsible for the poor mechanical performance of those composites. Vaidya et al [14] on the other hand, provide evidence that in spray-cast 15 vol.% B 4 C reinforced 6061 aluminum alloy, the reinforcement significantly enhances the mechanical properties of the matrix both in quasi-static and dynamic testing. The composites are found to be reaction-free and the interface is reported to be very strong due to good wetting of the B 4 C particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have determined that the predominant damage micromechanisms leading to this degradation are: (i) reinforcement fracture, (ii) void nucleation and growth in the matrix and (iii) debonding along the matrix/reinforcement interface [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. With respect to the influence of basic microstructural parameters on the rate of damage accumulation, it has been shown that increasing reinforcement size, angularity, aspect ratio, volume fraction, inhomogeneity in spatial distribution, interface degradation and matrix strength increases the level of damage in particle reinforced MMCs [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure by interface debonding has been observed by Vaidya et al [5,6] in a composite prepared by spray forming. No debonding was observed in the present work, which suggests that the composite prepared by the powder metallurgy technique used here has a strong SiC±aluminium alloy interfacial strength.…”
Section: Fracture Surfacementioning
confidence: 94%
“…This problem has been addressed by reinforcing the alloys with SiC particles or whiskers. Whilst there has been extensive study on the behaviour of SiC particles reinforced Al alloys upon quasi-static deformation [1±4], there are relatively few reports available on their dynamic response at high strain rates (>10 3 s À1 ) [5,6]. In order to use the composites more safely and ef®ciently, a more thorough understanding of their dynamic behaviour is clearly needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%